MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
23,330 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
exhaust noisey
Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
exhaust noisey
Drive chain sprocket worn, but not excessively (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy headstock bearings (2.2.2 (f) (i))
exhaust noisey
Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements number plate too small (0.1 (d))
exhaust noisey
Drive chain sprocket worn, but not excessively (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy headstock bearings (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
all lights taped time of test . day time mot
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil forks (5.3.2 (b))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front tyre perished
Rear tyre perished
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
front Tyre side wall perished
Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Throttle operating incorrectly (6.2.1f)
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
front Tyre side wall perished
Lower Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Roller brake test Higher brake efficiency normally obtainable. (3.3.A2a)
Exhaust noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar motor bicycle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition (7.1.2)
Front Direction indicators affected by the operation of another lamp (1.5.1c)
Front Tyre has a lump caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.2a(ii))
Horn not loud enough to be heard by another road user (1.7.3a)
Nearside Handlebar handgrip not secure to handlebars. (2.1.1c)
Rear Registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Front suspension has inadequate damping effect. (2.3.6c) DANGEROUS
Rear Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a) DANGEROUS
Rear Stop lamp affected by the operation of another lamp (1.3.2) DANGEROUS
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Front Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded. (4.2.1b)
Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Nearside Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Rear Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Roller brake test Higher brake efficiency normally obtainable. (3.3.A2a)
Stop lamp slightly discoloured (1.3.1b)
front mud gaurd rusty
Front Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front suspension has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.3.6c)
Rear position lamp slightly affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.3b)
Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
front tyre perrished(1999),
Fuel system component leaking (7.2.1a) DANGEROUS
Lower Rear suspension fouling which affects the movement of the rear suspension (2.4.A.3a) DANGEROUS
Front Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Motorcycle structure slightly insecure (6.1.1c)
Front suspension has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.3.6c)
Rear position lamp slightly affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.3b)
Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
front tyre perrished(1999),
loose wiring by radiator
Front Front suspension has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.3.6c)
Front Roller brake test Higher brake efficiency normally obtainable. (3.3.A2b)
reserve travel at brake lever just about acceptable
How Reliable is the Honda VT600?
Based on 6,311 MOT tests across 627 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
F152 LLG is a 1992 Honda VT600 in Maroon with a 599cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.2%.
Across all 1992 Honda VT600 models, the average MOT pass rate is 84.3% with a typical mileage of 19,560 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda VT600 fails its MOT is shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil, accounting for 101 recorded failures. If you're considering buying F152 LLG, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda VT600 typically stays on UK roads for around 38 years. At 34 years old, this Honda VT600 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of F152 LLG?
You can check the full history of F152 LLG by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was F152 LLG registered?
F152 LLG is a 1992 Honda VT600, first registered on 8 June 1992.
Is F152 LLG safe to buy?
The MOT history for F152 LLG shows 18 tests with a 72.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does F152 LLG have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on F152 LLG. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.