MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
84,373 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded and o/s front (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit and o/s front tyre bald inner edges (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement axle beam bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit and tread separating/cracking/side walls cracking (4.1.E.1)
Nearside brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened and o/s (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear tyre worn unevenly on inner edge
centre stop light not working
main fuel pipe corroded at rear
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement axle beam bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill back (2.4.A.3)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded and o/s front (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit and o/s front tyre bald inner edges (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement axle beam bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit and tread separation/cracking (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear tyre worn unevenly on inner edge
centre stop light not working
front brake discs lightly corroded/pitted
main fuel pipe corroded at rear
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Nearside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Oil leak
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
n/s rear brakes low effort
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear wiper split
Offside Rear Parking brake is not capable of being maintained in operation by direct mechanical action only (3.1.2)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Both front tyres worn badly on inside edges
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FD51 KJN is a 2002 Ford Puma in Blue with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.1%.
Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FD51 KJN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FD51 KJN?
You can check the full history of FD51 KJN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FD51 KJN registered?
FD51 KJN is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 12 February 2002.
Is FD51 KJN safe to buy?
The MOT history for FD51 KJN shows 18 tests with a 61.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FD51 KJN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FD51 KJN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.