MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
82,993 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Rear Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Coolant leak ()
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Front Lower Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Shock absorber has slight corrosion to the casing (2.7.2a)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear light cluster damaged
Offside Rear light cluster damaged
Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) slightly corroded (2.3.2)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 30% (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front slight bind to brake
Rear Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Rear lenses repaired
Towball/hitch not fitted at time of test ()
surface rust on chassis
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 30% (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front slight bind to brake
Rear Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Rear lenses repaired
Towball/hitch not fitted at time of test ()
surface rust on chassis
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
tow bar ball hitch removed
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
tow bar ball hitch removed
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
ball hitch & trailer electrical removed
chassis & brake pipes undersealed
nearside rear lens repaired
ball hitch & trailer electrical removed
chassis & brake pipes undersealed
nearside rear lens repaired
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Tow ball/hitch not fitted at time of test
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
trailer electrical socket & wiring removed
tyres perishing
Front Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Trailer electrical socket insecure (1.9.3a)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside rear brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
tyres perishing
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
air bag light on
front subframe rusty
nearside rear brake disc rusted
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
nearside rear brake disc rusted
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Lower Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Fuel cap/sealing device does not fasten securely maintaining the sealing arrangement (7.2.4b)
Nearside Brake cable has wires broken and is significantly weakened (3.5.1b)
Nearside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Rear brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Nearside Side repeater incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Side repeater incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Rear rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Lower Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low and too far to the right. (1.8)
How Reliable is the Iveco Daily 35 S14 LWB?
Based on 3,534 MOT tests across 284 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FD55 PYL is a 2006 Iveco Daily 35 S14 LWB in White with a 2,286cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 52.9%.
Across all 2006 Iveco Daily 35 S14 LWB models, the average MOT pass rate is 64.7% with a typical mileage of 123,950 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Iveco Daily 35 S14 LWB fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 280 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FD55 PYL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Iveco Daily 35 S14 LWB typically stays on UK roads for around 21 years. At 20 years old, this Iveco Daily 35 S14 LWB is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FD55 PYL?
You can check the full history of FD55 PYL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FD55 PYL registered?
FD55 PYL is a 2006 Iveco Daily 35 S14 LWB, first registered on 26 January 2006.
Is FD55 PYL safe to buy?
The MOT history for FD55 PYL shows 17 tests with a 52.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FD55 PYL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FD55 PYL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.