MOT Status
ValidMileage
159,191 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Road wheel more than one fixing missing HAS 3 WHEEL BOLTS MISSING (5.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Engine covers, sill covers and under trays fitted limiting view to testable items/areas
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively s)(worn/lipped (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front arm inner bushes deteriorating on nearside and offside (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear arm inner bushes badly deteriorated and require attention soon. Nearside and offside (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Tyre pressure monoiritng system indicates loss of pressure in one or more tyres
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view cracked (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake hose excessively deteriorated (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake hose excessively deteriorated (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Engine covers, sill covers and under trays fitted limiting view to testable items/areas
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively s)(worn/lipped (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front arm inner bushes deteriorating on nearside and offside (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear arm inner bushes badly deteriorated and require attention soon. Nearside and offside (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Tyre pressure monoiritng system indicates loss of pressure in one or more tyres
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view cracked (3.2 (a) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened front and rear discs have lips (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened front and rear discs have lips (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Position lamp not working both lamps (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
both front tyres worn on inner and outer tread
n/s/f tyre has damage to curb wall
How Reliable is the Seat Exeo?
Based on 105,166 MOT tests across 8,155 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FD62 XST is a 2012 Seat Exeo in Black with a 1,968cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.8%.
Across all 2012 Seat Exeo models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.3% with a typical mileage of 90,674 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Seat Exeo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 1,618 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FD62 XST, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Seat Exeo typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 14 years old, this Seat Exeo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FD62 XST?
You can check the full history of FD62 XST by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FD62 XST registered?
FD62 XST is a 2012 Seat Exeo, first registered on 20 December 2012.
Is FD62 XST safe to buy?
The MOT history for FD62 XST shows 18 tests with a 77.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FD62 XST have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FD62 XST. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.