MOT Status
ValidMileage
71,939 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear light cluster damaged
Offside Front tyre wearing on inner edge
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear suspension components corroded
corrosion forming on offside and nearside rear inner sill and chassis leg areas
offside and nearside headlight beam patterns poor
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Fronts Cracked/Deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Handbrake Lever has Excess Travel
Nearside Front Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Top Mount (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Damaged/Holed (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Inner Sill/Mounting Area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Rear Beam Axle (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Both Headlamps Lenses Deteriorated (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Outer Sill has Corrosion Hole (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed Outer Sidewall Cracked to Cords (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Fronts Cracked/Deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Handbrake Lever has Excess Travel
Nearside Front Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Top Mount (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Damaged/Holed (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Inner Sill/Mounting Area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Rear Beam Axle (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Fronts Deteriorated/Frayed (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both Headlamps Deteriorated with Poor Beam Image (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Top Mount (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Tread Near Limit on Inner Half and Cracking /Perishing Condition (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp light intensity severely reduced (4.1.4 (a))
Nearside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Headlamp light intensity severely reduced (4.1.4 (a))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both Fronts - Inner Surfaces Worn Unevenly/Corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Handbrake Lever has Excess Travel
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively Binding Slightly (1.2.1 (f))
Oil leak, but not excessive Front of Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Front Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn on inner edge. (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Fuel tank leaking from neck (7.2.3)
Nearside rear tyre cracked but not exposing cords
Offside rear tyre cracked but not exposing cords
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Toyota Aygo?
Based on 3,073,569 MOT tests across 286,185 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FE56 HFL is a 2006 Toyota Aygo in Silver with a 998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.3%.
Across all 2006 Toyota Aygo models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.6% with a typical mileage of 60,291 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Toyota Aygo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 33,372 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FE56 HFL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Aygo typically stays on UK roads for around 21 years. At 20 years old, this Toyota Aygo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FE56 HFL?
You can check the full history of FE56 HFL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FE56 HFL registered?
FE56 HFL is a 2006 Toyota Aygo, first registered on 29 September 2006.
Is FE56 HFL safe to buy?
The MOT history for FE56 HFL shows 22 tests with a 77.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FE56 HFL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FE56 HFL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.