MOT Status
ValidMileage
121,299 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coil spring corroded NS front and BOTH rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both ns ns and os (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement BOTH NS AND OS ON REARMOST BUSHES within alloy housing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt central row ()
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both ns and os pitted / corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear NS and OS shock absorber dust boots / bump stops deteriorated
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened ALL: NS and OS (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
corrosion to some underbody components
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed ** on inner edge (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Coil spring corroded NS front and BOTH rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both ns ns and os (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement BOTH NS AND OS ON REARMOST BUSHES within alloy housing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt central row ()
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge inner edge uneven wear (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2mm + see ** (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both ns and os pitted / corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear NS and OS shock absorber dust boots / bump stops deteriorated
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened ALL: NS and OS (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
corrosion to some underbody components
Coil spring corroded ns front, NS rear and os rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement BOTH NS AND OS REARMOST BUSHES: within alloy housing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened BOTH NS AND OS (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened ALL track control arms and LOWER WISHBONE ARMS (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear both ns and os shock absorber dust boots / bump stops deteriorated
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
corrosion to some underbody components
Nearside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Coil spring corroded ns front, NS rear and os rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement BOTH NS AND OS REARMOST BUSHES: within alloy housing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened BOTH NS AND OS (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened ALL track control arms and LOWER WISHBONE ARMS (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear both ns and os shock absorber dust boots / bump stops deteriorated
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
corrosion to some underbody components
1 of 2 reversing lamp/s in-op: NS
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rearmost bush within alloy housing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both ns and os partly pitted / corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively ns and os (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened all ns and os (5.3.3 (b) (i))
corrosion to some underbody components
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Inner Edges (5.2.3 (e))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both Front Tyres Inner Edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Central Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement Rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement Rear bush (2.4.G.2)
How Reliable is the Seat Alhambra?
Based on 690,916 MOT tests across 54,940 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FE62 XHK is a 2012 Seat Alhambra in Silver with a 1,968cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.3%.
Across all 2012 Seat Alhambra models, the average MOT pass rate is 78.8% with a typical mileage of 82,551 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Seat Alhambra fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 23,231 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FE62 XHK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Seat Alhambra typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 14 years old, this Seat Alhambra is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FE62 XHK?
You can check the full history of FE62 XHK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FE62 XHK registered?
FE62 XHK is a 2012 Seat Alhambra, first registered on 1 September 2012.
Is FE62 XHK safe to buy?
The MOT history for FE62 XHK shows 15 tests with a 73.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FE62 XHK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FE62 XHK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.