MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
47,294 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Oil leak ()
rear axle bushes have slight play
rear inner sills & floor pan signs of corrosion
signs of corrosion around front sub frame & spring mounts
Nearside Front Front passenger door cannot be opened from outside the vehicle (6.2.B.1b)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low wont adjust (1.8)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (5.2.6)
Oil leak ()
coolant level low
rear axle bushes have slight play
rear inner sills & floor pan signs of corrosion
signs of corrosion around front sub frame & spring mounts
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded multiple (3.6.B.2c)
underside has surface corrosion
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a pin/bush rear (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded multiple (3.6.B.2c)
underside has surface corrosion
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
corrosion on offside floor chassis rail
corrosion on offside front floor pan
rear wiper blade defective
offside and nearside front lower arms [rear] bush deteriorating
rear wiper blade defective
spare tyre perishing
Offside Front suspension ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
lift in nearside front strut
nearside rear tyre worn low inside edge
offside and nearside rear tyres sidewalls perishing
spare tyre flat and sidewalls perished
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
nearside rear tyre wearing low inside edge
rear wiper blade deteriorated
spare tyre low pressure and side walls perished
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
nearside rear tyre wearing low inside edge
rear wiper blade deteriorated
spare tyre low pressure and side walls perished
nearside front tyre worn to legal limit inside edge devoid of tread
offside and nearside rear tyres side walls cracking
offside front bottom ball joint boot split
rear wiper blade split
nearside mirror missing
offside and nearside rear tyres sidewalls cracking
offside front bottom ball joint boot split
rear wiper blade split
slight movement nearside front top strut mount
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
nearside mirror missing
offside and nearside rear tyres sidewalls cracking
offside front bottom ball joint boot split
rear wiper blade split
slight movement nearside front top strut mount
Offside Front coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FG03 UFN is a 2003 Ford Ka in Silver with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2003 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.4% with a typical mileage of 47,451 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FG03 UFN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FG03 UFN?
You can check the full history of FG03 UFN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FG03 UFN registered?
FG03 UFN is a 2003 Ford Ka, first registered on 31 March 2003.
Is FG03 UFN safe to buy?
The MOT history for FG03 UFN shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FG03 UFN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FG03 UFN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.