MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
104,105 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Lower Body has slight corrosion sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Lower Body has slight corrosion sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)
Oil leak ()
front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush both sides d bushes
offside Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear section
offside rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive upper chassis near trailing arm bush
Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush both sides d bushes (2.4.G.2)
Offside Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear section (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive upper chassis near trailing arm bush (2.4.A.3)
coolant level low
engine oil leak
Centre Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle 43% (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside front brakes release unevenly (3.7.B.4)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords inner wall 165/60/14 (4.1.D.1a)
Power steering fluid level below minimum (2.3.1)
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded both sides inner sills holed near trailing arm bushes (2.4.A.3)
Registration plate lamp not working both sides (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c) DANGEROUS
Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush both sides d bushes (2.4.G.2)
Offside Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear section (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive upper chassis near trailing arm bush (2.4.A.3)
coolant level low
engine oil leak
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside sill starting to corrode.
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside sill starting to corrode.
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) has slight seepage (2.3.3b)
Nearside Windscreen wiper blade deteriorated (8.2.2)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Offside Windscreen wiper blade deteriorated (8.2.2)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b) DANGEROUS
both front tyres wearing on edges
slight play in steering rack
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FG03 VNV is a 2003 Ford Ka in Black with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.8%.
Across all 2003 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.4% with a typical mileage of 47,451 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FG03 VNV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FG03 VNV?
You can check the full history of FG03 VNV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FG03 VNV registered?
FG03 VNV is a 2003 Ford Ka, first registered on 27 March 2003.
Is FG03 VNV safe to buy?
The MOT history for FG03 VNV shows 18 tests with a 77.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FG03 VNV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FG03 VNV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.