MOT Status
ValidMileage
90,312 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing all 4 tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated o/s and n/s (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated o/s and n/s (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement o/s and n/s bushes perishing front and rear of front arms (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement o/s and n/s (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake pipes above fuel tank not visable
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Trailing arm front bushes worn on both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure On outer wall (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Casing showing outer wall to tread area (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Bald on edges (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake pipes above fuel tank not visable
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Trailing arm front bushes worn on both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake pipes above fuel tank not visable
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Trailing arm front bushes worn on both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake pipes above fuel tank not visable
Offside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure On outer wall (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Corroded on inner face and in vents New brake discs rqd (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pipes above fuel tank not visable
Driver's airbag obviously inoperative Warning light on (7.1.5 (c))
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Cracks in tyre walls on both sides (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm On outer edge (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake pipes above fuel tank not visable
Brake pipes above fuel tank not visable
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front Slight noise on wheel bearings found on road test
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Worn (3.5.1i)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
How Reliable is the Nissan Pixo?
Based on 217,471 MOT tests across 14,452 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FG12 DZR is a 2012 Nissan Pixo in Blue with a 996cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2012 Nissan Pixo models, the average MOT pass rate is 79.7% with a typical mileage of 35,452 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Pixo fails its MOT is windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively, accounting for 2,894 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FG12 DZR, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Pixo typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 14 years old, this Nissan Pixo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FG12 DZR?
You can check the full history of FG12 DZR by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FG12 DZR registered?
FG12 DZR is a 2012 Nissan Pixo, first registered on 31 May 2012.
Is FG12 DZR safe to buy?
The MOT history for FG12 DZR shows 16 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FG12 DZR have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FG12 DZR. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.