MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
133,158 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Front to rear pipe(s) some corrosion present (1.1.11 (c))
Central Rear Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Fuel Pipe/s corroded Pipe(s) some corrosion present ()
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Upper and lower dust cover(s) (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Upper and lower dust cover(s) (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Upper Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Prop shaft flexible coupling slightly deteriorated (6.1.7 (d) (i))
Rear Oil leak, but not excessive Differential slightly weeping (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Parking brake efficiency only just met. it would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (16%)
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Front to rear pipe(s) some corrosion present (1.1.11 (c))
Central Rear Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Fuel Pipe/s corroded Pipe(s) some corrosion present ()
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Upper and lower dust cover(s) (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Upper and lower dust cover(s) (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Upper Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Prop shaft flexible coupling slightly deteriorated (6.1.7 (d) (i))
Rear Oil leak, but not excessive Differential slightly weeping (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Parking brake efficiency only just met. it would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (16%)
offside front tyre tread worn to 2mm
offside front suspension lower ball joint slight movement
centre prop shaft carrier slight wear
centre rear seat belt starting to fur
front antiroll bar bushes starting to wear
front exhaust section starting to rust
metal fuel pipes starting to rust
offside front steering track rod end slight play
rear brakes performances slight imbalance
rear diff slightly damp
rear of front to rear metal brake pipe starting to rust
centre prop carrier slight wear
centre rear seat belt starting to fur
front antiroll bar mounting bushes slight movement
front exhaust starting to rust
offside front tyre tread inner edge starting to wear
offside steering track rod end slight play
rear diff slightly damp
centre prop carrier slight wear
centre rear seatbelt buckle starting to fur
front antiroll bar end bushes slight movement
front exhaust starting to rust
offside steering track rod end slight play
rear diff slightly damp
rear suspension springs bushes starting to crack/ perish
centre rear seatbelt starting to fur
front antiroll bar end bushes slight movement
front exhaust starting to rust
offside steering track rod end slight play
rear suspension springs bushes starting to crack/ perish
centre rear seatbelt starting to fur
front exhaust starting to rust
rear suspension springs bushes starting to crack/ perish
slight oil leak
centre rear seatbelt starting to fur
front exhaust starting to rust
nearside front wiper blade rubber starting to split/ wear
rear brake slight imbalance
rear suspension springs bushes starting to crack/ perish
slight oil leak
centre rear seatbelt starting to fur
front exhaust starting to rust
rear suspension spring bushes starting to crack/ perish
slight oil leak
slight oil leak
centre propshaft carrier rubber starting to perish
rear tailgate handle slight damage
slight oil leak
centre exhaust heatshield slightly loose
front antiroll bar end bushes slight movement
rear suspension springs starting to rust and bushes starting to perish
slight oil leak
slight bind nearside front brake by hand
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab?
Based on 774,794 MOT tests across 49,827 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FG55 YGA is a 2005 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab in White with a 2,477cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 93.3%.
Across all 2005 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.2% with a typical mileage of 86,553 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,357 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FG55 YGA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 21 years old, this Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FG55 YGA?
You can check the full history of FG55 YGA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FG55 YGA registered?
FG55 YGA is a 2005 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab, first registered on 7 November 2005.
Is FG55 YGA safe to buy?
The MOT history for FG55 YGA shows 15 tests with a 93.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FG55 YGA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FG55 YGA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.