MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
168,038 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Wheel Arch Corroded And Holed
Nearside Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear (4.7.1 (a))
Offside Front Bumper mountings corroded but not likely to become detached (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear (4.7.1 (a))
Offside Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Rear Wheel Arch Corroded And Holed
Oil leak, but not excessive Lower Engine Area Has Oil Dampness (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread Number Plate Cracked But Still Readable (0.1 (b))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Surface Corrosion on Areas Of Chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced sill holed inner and outer (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp does not emit a steady red light (4.5.4 (a))
Central Front Oil leak, but not excessive sump (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Body panel slightly loose arch (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear (4.7.1 (a))
Offside Front Bumper mountings corroded but not likely to become detached (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Body panel slightly loose arch (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear (4.7.1 (a))
Prop shaft bearing has slight play (6.1.7 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Multiple Areas Corroded But Not Holed At Time Of Test (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Wheel bearing has excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Flange Between Middle Section And Tail Pipe Corroded
Prop shaft bearing has slight play (6.1.7 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Multiple Areas Corroded But Not Holed At Time Of Test (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Middle Section Exhaust In Poor Condition Due To Rust
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Calliper R.B.P Slightly Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material R.B.P Slightly Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Upper Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material R.B.P Slightly Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material R.B.P Slightly Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive Lower Engine Area Has Slight Oil Leak (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Tail Pipe Section Exhaust In Poor Condition Due To Rust
Nearside Brake pipe excessively corroded Front To Rear R.B.P Heavily Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Brake pipe excessively corroded Front To Rear R.B.P Heavily Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded Calliper R.B.P Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Middle Section Exhaust In Poor Condition Due To Rust
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Calliper R.B.P Slightly Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material R.B.P Slightly Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge On Legal Limit of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Upper Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material R.B.P Slightly Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material R.B.P Slightly Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge On Legal Limit of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive Lower Engine Area Has Slight Oil Leak (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Tail Pipe Section Exhaust In Poor Condition Due To Rust
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Exhaust mounting defective Joining flange between centre rear section and tailpipe corroded but secure (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Brake pad anti-rattle spring missing, Does not effect operation but pads rattle inside caliper
Offside Front Obligatory mirror slightly loose (3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
front discs in poor condition
front tyres wearing low
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear registration plate letter/figure incomplete (6.3.1c)
Trailer electrical socket damaged so that lead cannot be securely connected (1.9.3b)
front discs in poor condition
front tyres wearing low
heat shield insecure
Nearside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Front front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Battery insecure (1.9.1) DANGEROUS
How Reliable is the Toyota Hilux?
Based on 1,500,658 MOT tests across 146,528 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FG62 RWZ is a 2012 Toyota Hilux in White with a 2,494cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 62.5%.
Across all 2012 Toyota Hilux models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.9% with a typical mileage of 77,987 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota Hilux fails its MOT is fog lamp not working, accounting for 30,380 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FG62 RWZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Hilux typically stays on UK roads for around 39 years. At 14 years old, this Toyota Hilux is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FG62 RWZ?
You can check the full history of FG62 RWZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FG62 RWZ registered?
FG62 RWZ is a 2012 Toyota Hilux, first registered on 29 October 2012.
Is FG62 RWZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for FG62 RWZ shows 16 tests with a 62.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FG62 RWZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FG62 RWZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.