MOT Status
ValidMileage
105,468 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength x3 inner chassis and outer sill and inner wheel arch (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear wheel has slight bind
spare wheel carrier corroded
Front Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
front subframe corroded
Offside Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Suspension spring mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Upper Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Upper Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
both steps under sealed
Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Seat belt buckle missing (7.1.2 (d))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
both steps under sealed
Exhaust system slightly corroded
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 215/70R15 CP 109R (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced chassis leg/inner arch around subframe (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
exhaust outer skin corroded
Offside Front Brake pipe inadequately supported flexi hose (3.6.B.1)
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded chassis leg to inner wing (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner wing (2.4.A.3)
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
both rear tyres cracking
exhaust outer skin corroded
front chassis legs by flexi brake hose brackets showing signs of corrosion
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
both front chassis legs by front flexi brake hose brackets showing signs of corrosion
both rear tyre outer sidewalls cracking
exhaust outer skin corroded
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
both front chassis legs by subframe mounts rusty
exhaust system outer skin corroded
o/s/front chassis leg/inner wing slightly corroded by flexi brake hose bracket
rear tyres cracking
Nearside Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
both front chassis legs by subframe mounts rusty
exhaust system outer skin corroded
o/s/front chassis leg/inner wing slightly corroded by flexi brake hose bracket
rear tyres cracking
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
exhaust slightly deteriorated
o/s mirror slightly perished
rear tyres slightly perished
Offside Inner Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Obligatory mirror damaged, but not seriously affecting the rear view (8.1.2a)
exhaust slightly deteriorated
vehicle milage is as displayed 78668 with new clocks.the faulty clocks with the actual milage was 31552
Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
o/s/f mirror cracked
slight damage to o/s mirror
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
How Reliable is the Fiat Camper?
Based on 19,075 MOT tests across 931 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FH02 HBA is a 2002 Fiat Camper in White with a 2,000cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 26 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.1%.
Across all 2002 Fiat Camper models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.6% with a typical mileage of 42,279 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Fiat Camper fails its MOT is windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively, accounting for 299 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FH02 HBA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat Camper typically stays on UK roads for around 41 years. At 24 years old, this Fiat Camper is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FH02 HBA?
You can check the full history of FH02 HBA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FH02 HBA registered?
FH02 HBA is a 2002 Fiat Camper, first registered on 15 July 2002.
Is FH02 HBA safe to buy?
The MOT history for FH02 HBA shows 26 tests with a 73.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FH02 HBA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FH02 HBA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.