MOT Status
ValidMileage
73,975 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Slight corrosion O/S rear inner door sill
Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear (2.4.G.1)
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside and nearside (2.4.G.1)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside and nearside (2.4.G.1)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive offside and nearside (2.4.A.3)
Rear coil spring corroded offside and nearside (2.4.C.1b)
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear (2.4.G.1)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Sub-frame attachment slightly corroded front offside & nearside (2.4.G.1)
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front & rear (2.4.G.1)
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened front lower & rear upper & lower (2.4.G.1)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all (3.5.1i)
coil spring corroded rear offside & nearside (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front & rear (2.4.G.1)
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened front & rear (2.4.G.1)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all front & rear (3.5.1i)
coil spring corroded both rear (2.4.C.1b)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Upper Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Upper Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
nearside front tyre wearing out of shape on inner tread
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Toyota Celica?
Based on 870,417 MOT tests across 67,994 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FH03 ERJ is a 2003 Toyota Celica in Blue with a 1,794cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 91.3%.
Across all 2003 Toyota Celica models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.3% with a typical mileage of 82,604 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Toyota Celica fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 43,337 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FH03 ERJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Celica typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 23 years old, this Toyota Celica is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FH03 ERJ?
You can check the full history of FH03 ERJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FH03 ERJ registered?
FH03 ERJ is a 2003 Toyota Celica, first registered on 24 May 2003.
Is FH03 ERJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for FH03 ERJ shows 23 tests with a 91.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FH03 ERJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FH03 ERJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.