MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
119,501 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Central Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner rear sill /rear chassis has light corrosion (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint roll bar link lower joint has play (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner rear sill/rear chassis has light corrosion (2.4.A.3)
Central Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Central Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced head lamp was cloudy (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner rear sill /rear chassis has light corrosion (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint roll bar link lower joint has play (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced headlamp was cloudy (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner rear sill/rear chassis has light corrosion (2.4.A.3)
rear discs worn/scored
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
rear discs worn/scored
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
floor corroded
inner sills corroded
offside front headlamp faded
plastic sill covers fitted
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
floor corroded
inner sills corroded
offside front headlamp faded
plastic sill covers fitted
Nearside front tyre has surface side wall damage
both rear tyres slightly out of shape
rear chassi salightly corroded
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Rear brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
slight handbrake travel
Nearside Front Headlamp not in good working order (not working) (1.2.4a)
slight handbrake travel
rear brake discs corroded on inner edges
slight handbrake travel
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
rear brake discs corroded on inner edges
slight handbrake travel
How Reliable is the Toyota Celica?
Based on 870,417 MOT tests across 67,994 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FH51 XZN is a 2002 Toyota Celica in Red with a 1,796cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.4%.
Across all 2002 Toyota Celica models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.5% with a typical mileage of 85,197 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota Celica fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 43,337 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FH51 XZN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Celica typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 24 years old, this Toyota Celica is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FH51 XZN?
You can check the full history of FH51 XZN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FH51 XZN registered?
FH51 XZN is a 2002 Toyota Celica, first registered on 14 January 2002.
Is FH51 XZN safe to buy?
The MOT history for FH51 XZN shows 19 tests with a 68.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FH51 XZN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FH51 XZN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.