MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
51,975 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
park brake has reserve travel
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
alternator noisy
engine management light on
nearside & offside rear tyres slight cracking
nearside front driveshaft speed sensor ring split
nearside outer sill poor
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
alternator noisy
engine management light on
nearside & offside rear tyres slight cracking
nearside front driveshaft speed sensor ring split
nearside outer sill poor
alternator noise
engine management light on
nearside outer sill poor
Offside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded to the extent that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected sill (5.3.6 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
engine management light on
nearside outer sill poor
alternator noise
alternator noisy
engine management light on
nearside & offside outer sills poor
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
alternator noisy
engine management light on
nearside & offside outer sills poor
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases Rear Silencer (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Engine Management Light Illuminated (Pre - 01/07/2003).
Slight Brake Squeal On Rear Brakes.
nearside front tyre poor
slight bind on nearside front brake
Nearside Front Tyre 3mm Tread, Worn On Edges. (Secondary Grooves).
Slight Bind On Nearside Front Wheel.
Slight Corrosion To Offside Outer Sill.
Speedometer Pick-up Ring Split/Cracked (Nearside Front). Speedometer Operative
Nearside Front Tyre 3mm Tread.
Slight Brake Bind On Nearside Front Wheel.
Speedometer Pick-up Ring (NSF) Split. Speedometer Operative.
Nearside Front Tyre 3mm Tread on Edges.
Offside Front Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
drivers seat does not tilt forwards
drivers seat does not tilt forwards
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Rover 25?
Based on 1,784,341 MOT tests across 157,261 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FJ02 XHB is a 2002 Rover 25 in Silver with a 1,396cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 27 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 74.1%.
Across all 2002 Rover 25 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.3% with a typical mileage of 50,970 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover 25 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 69,670 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FJ02 XHB, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 25 typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 24 years old, this Rover 25 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FJ02 XHB?
You can check the full history of FJ02 XHB by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FJ02 XHB registered?
FJ02 XHB is a 2002 Rover 25, first registered on 1 March 2002.
Is FJ02 XHB safe to buy?
The MOT history for FJ02 XHB shows 27 tests with a 74.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FJ02 XHB have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FJ02 XHB. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.