MOT Status
ValidMileage
53,795 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Corrosion on sills (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Central Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases centre (6.1.2 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt offside (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases centre to front (6.1.2 (a))
Front brake pipes slightly corroded both sides
Nearside Rear brake pipe corroded
Nearside Rear tyre slight cracking
Offside Rear tyre worn on outer edge/slight cracking
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front bushes perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength nearside rear inner wheel arch (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength offside rear (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases centre to front (6.1.2 (a))
Front brake pipes slightly corroded both sides
Nearside Rear brake pipe corroded
Nearside Rear tyre slight cracking
Offside Rear tyre worn on outer edge/slight cracking
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front bushes perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre obviously under inflated offside rear (5.2.3 (l))
Engine mounting damaged but not to excess nearside (6.1.8 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases rear (6.1.2 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Position lamp with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning nearside rear (4.2.1 (a) (i))
Central Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Engine Management Light On
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both end bushes (2.4.G.2)
poor headlamp pattern
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded o/s centre sill (5.2.6)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded both rear outer sills (2.4.A.3)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded o/s/r inner wing at bottom (2.4.A.3)
Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both end bushes (2.4.G.2)
poor headlamp pattern
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both outer sills (5.2.6)
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Steering rack gaiter insecure (2.2.D.2d)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both outer sills (5.2.6)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both (1.7.5a)
Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both outer sills (5.2.6)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
clutch pedal rubber missing
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Offside Rear rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
How Reliable is the Daewoo Matiz?
Based on 724,041 MOT tests across 61,622 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FN51 LJZ is a 2001 Daewoo Matiz in Blue with a 796cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 27 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.8%.
Across all 2001 Daewoo Matiz models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.8% with a typical mileage of 47,393 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Daewoo Matiz fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,507 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FN51 LJZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Daewoo Matiz typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 25 years old, this Daewoo Matiz is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FN51 LJZ?
You can check the full history of FN51 LJZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FN51 LJZ registered?
FN51 LJZ is a 2001 Daewoo Matiz, first registered on 1 September 2001.
Is FN51 LJZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for FN51 LJZ shows 27 tests with a 77.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FN51 LJZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FN51 LJZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.