MOT Status
ValidMileage
76,182 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Direction indicator slightly discoloured n/s/f o/s/f (4.4.3 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
n/s/r o/s/r wheel arches rusty
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced jacking point area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced various points along inner sills and front arch (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced near leaf spring (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced jacking point area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced various points along inner sills and front arch (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced near leaf spring (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour both white (4.4.3 (a))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Rear Outer Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced sill corners of rear arch (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Coil spring corroded n/s/f o/s/f (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive N/S/R O/S/R back panel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive n/s/f o/s/f inner arches (5.3.6 (a) (i))
n/s/f o/s/f jacking point corroded
Offside Front Inner Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced sill to foot step (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Coil spring corroded n/s/f o/s/f (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive N/S/R O/S/R back panel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive n/s/f o/s/f inner arches (5.3.6 (a) (i))
n/s/f o/s/f jacking point corroded
Offside Front Suspension strut inner wing top mounting area corroded
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Brake cable damaged (1.1.15 (a))
Offside Brake cable damaged (1.1.15 (a))
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
vehicles outer body is showing signs of corrosion in around wheel arch areas
vehicles under body, sill to floor areas has had extensive welding carried out
Nearside Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced inner siil to floor (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced inner sill to floor (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp insecure (4.7.1 (c) (i))
vehicles outer body is showing signs of corrosion in around wheel arch areas
Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security offside and nearside sill to floor areas (6.2.2 (d) (i))
vehicles outer body is showing slight corrosion around sills and wheel arch areas
vehicles underbody and chassis showing signs of slight corrosion
Integral body structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting offside front floor under wheel arch (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Integral body structure has excessive corrosion which adversely affects braking or steering nearside sill to floor (6.1.1 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
coil spring corroded offside and nearside front (2.4.C.1b)
offside lower mirror cracked
vehicles underbody /chassis showing signs of slight corrosion and in places and has had welding carried out previously
Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings nearside sill to floor near out rigger (6.1.B.2)
Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings offside centre sill to floor (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
coil spring corroded offside and nearside front (2.4.C.1b)
offside lower mirror cracked
Oil leak sump ()
Offside Rear Inner Vehicle structure has slight corrosion sill (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Inner Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings door sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Inner Vehicle structure has slight corrosion sill (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint is insecure (2.5.C.1b)
Offside Front Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
offside lower mirror broken
n/s inner drive shaft gaiter split
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
lower offside mirror broken
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Nearside Front Steering rack gaiter insecure (2.2.D.2d)
Nearside Front rear brake juddering severely (3.7.A.5b)
Offside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Front Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
signs of diesel leak n/s/f
Nearside front brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.2b)
Offside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
How Reliable is the Citroen Relay?
Based on 1,209,729 MOT tests across 108,809 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FN53 VYA is a 2003 Citroen Relay in Silver with a 2,800cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 34 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.8%.
Across all 2003 Citroen Relay models, the average MOT pass rate is 65.1% with a typical mileage of 84,386 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Citroen Relay fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 39,680 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FN53 VYA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Citroen Relay typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 23 years old, this Citroen Relay is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FN53 VYA?
You can check the full history of FN53 VYA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FN53 VYA registered?
FN53 VYA is a 2003 Citroen Relay, first registered on 12 November 2003.
Is FN53 VYA safe to buy?
The MOT history for FN53 VYA shows 34 tests with a 61.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FN53 VYA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FN53 VYA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.