MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
78,650 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened both front and rear (2.4.G.1)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both front and rear (2.4.G.1)
both rear tyres crack on tread groove
Front Anti-roll bar linkage corroded but not seriously weakened both side (2.4.G.1)
Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both side (1.7.5a)
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both side (2.4.G.1)
Front Track rod end slightly corroded but serviceable both side (2.2.C.1d)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin both side (3.5.1g)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both side (2.4.G.1)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both side (3.5.1i)
both rear tyres got cracks on tread groove
engine cover ad under tray fitted
exhaust system corroded
parking brake uneven application
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Front Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front Anti-roll bar linkage corroded but not seriously weakened both side (2.4.G.1)
Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both side (1.7.5a)
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both side (2.4.G.1)
Front Track rod end slightly corroded but serviceable both side (2.2.C.1d)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin both side (3.5.1g)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both side (2.4.G.1)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both side (3.5.1i)
both front wipers smearing
both rear tyres got cracks on tread groove
engine cover ad under tray fitted
exhaust system corroded
parking brake uneven application
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
ehaust duct corroded
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
fan noisy
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Obligatory mirror insecure (8.1.1)
Offside Outer Front constant velocity joint is insecure (2.5.C.1b)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
fan noisy
fan belt deoteriorated
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Toyota Celica?
Based on 870,417 MOT tests across 67,994 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FP02 UKY is a 2002 Toyota Celica in Black with a 1,794cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 12 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 83.3%.
Across all 2002 Toyota Celica models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.5% with a typical mileage of 85,197 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Toyota Celica fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 43,337 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FP02 UKY, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Celica typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 24 years old, this Toyota Celica is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FP02 UKY?
You can check the full history of FP02 UKY by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FP02 UKY registered?
FP02 UKY is a 2002 Toyota Celica, first registered on 22 May 2002.
Is FP02 UKY safe to buy?
The MOT history for FP02 UKY shows 12 tests with a 83.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FP02 UKY have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FP02 UKY. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.