MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
105,742 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Central Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an exhaust leak (8.2.1.1 (b))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Exhaust Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (8.2.1.2 (c))
Exhaust carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds default limits (8.2.1.2 (b))
Exhaust carbon monoxide content at idle exceeds default limits (8.2.1.2 (b))
Exhaust hydrocarbon content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits (8.2.1.2 (a))
Rear Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an exhaust leak (8.2.1.1 (b))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Both front suspension road spring plastic seats have moved out of position
Both front suspension strut gaiters are split
Both rear tyres are worn to 4mm (minimum limit is 1.6mm) and the n/s/r sidewall is perished
The fuel filler flap retaining strap is broken
The n/s/f suspension strut top mounting is dry and squeaking
The n/s/f wheel trim is missing and all the others are slightly damaged
The rear brake pads are under half worn
There are small stonechips in the windscreen
There is various slight bodywork damage
There is various slight underbody and component corrosion
Both front suspension road spring plastic seats have moved out of position
Both front suspension strut gaiters are split
Both rear tyres are worn to 4mm (minimum limit is 1.6mm) and the n/s/r sidewall is perished
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
The fuel filler flap retaining strap is broken
The n/s/f suspension strut top mounting is dry and squeaking
The n/s/f wheel trim is missing and all the others are slightly damaged
The rear brake pads are under half worn
There are small stonechips in the windscreen
There is various slight bodywork damage
There is various slight underbody and component corrosion
front suspension strut gaiters perished.
front tyres side wall slightly perished and worn to 4 mm. Legal limit 1.6 mm.
plastic headlamp lenses in a poor condition.
various light scratches in the vehicle body.
various small stone chips in the windscreen.
exhaust system corroded but not leaking.
front tyres and spare tyre worn to 5 mm. Legal limit 1.6 mm.
plastic headlamp lenses in a poor condition.
various small stone chips in the windscreen.
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
exhaust system corroded but not leaking.
front tyres and spare tyre worn to 5 mm. Legal limit 1.6 mm.
plastic headlamp lenses in a poor condition.
various small stone chips in the windscreen.
headlamp lenses starting to deteriorate.
o/s headlamp adjuster not working.
o/s/r tyre worn to 3 mm,n/s/r tyre worn to 4 mm, both outer side walls scuffed/perished. Legal limit 1.6 mm.
underbody dry.
rear tyres worn to 4 mm. Legal limit 1.6 mm.
wheel trims scuffed.
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
rear tyres worn to 4 mm. Legal limit 1.6 mm.
wheel trims scuffed.
front brake pads worn low!
rear tyres worn to 4 mm.o/s/f tyre worn to 3 mm & n/s/f tyre worn to 2 mm. Legal limit 1.6 mm.
underbody dry/corroded slightly in passes! (Vehicle has been wax oyled).
front brake pads 2/3's worn,brake discs slightly lipped/worn.(Replace brake discs with next set of brake pads).
all tyres worn to 5 mm.Legal limit 1.6 mm.
front brake pads 1/2 worn.
o/s/r tyre worn to 5mm,n/s/r tyre worn to 3mm,both front tyres worn to 2mm.Legal limit 1.6mm.
rear brakes noisey.
How Reliable is the Nissan Almera?
Based on 2,976,239 MOT tests across 231,560 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FP05 ULJ is a 2005 Nissan Almera in Grey with a 1,769cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.2%.
Across all 2005 Nissan Almera models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.7% with a typical mileage of 58,958 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Almera fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 141,538 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FP05 ULJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Almera typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 21 years old, this Nissan Almera is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FP05 ULJ?
You can check the full history of FP05 ULJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FP05 ULJ registered?
FP05 ULJ is a 2005 Nissan Almera, first registered on 25 May 2005.
Is FP05 ULJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for FP05 ULJ shows 18 tests with a 72.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FP05 ULJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FP05 ULJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.