MOT Status
ValidMileage
168,176 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coolant leak lower radiator
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front both shocks corroded
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective poor image (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive transfer end seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sills (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Upper Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis rails both (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps both (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Coolant leak lower radiator
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced both (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front both shocks corroded
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective poor image (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive transfer end seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sills (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Upper Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis rails both (5.3.6 (a) (i))
requires brake fluid change
Cab or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security corrosion near rear suspension mounts (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn low on inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear tyres starting to perish (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Cab or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security corrosion near rear suspension mounts (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect no pattern due to bulb fitted incorrectly (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn low on inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear tyres starting to perish (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Suzuki SX4?
Based on 587,968 MOT tests across 47,332 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FP60 EDX is a 2010 Suzuki SX4 in Blue with a 1,586cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.8%.
Across all 2010 Suzuki SX4 models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.8% with a typical mileage of 57,369 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Suzuki SX4 fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 10,592 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FP60 EDX, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki SX4 typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 16 years old, this Suzuki SX4 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FP60 EDX?
You can check the full history of FP60 EDX by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FP60 EDX registered?
FP60 EDX is a 2010 Suzuki SX4, first registered on 10 December 2010.
Is FP60 EDX safe to buy?
The MOT history for FP60 EDX shows 18 tests with a 77.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FP60 EDX have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FP60 EDX. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.