MOT Status
ValidMileage
261,231 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge on 1.6-2mm 235/60/18 107v (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Outer Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge on 1.6-2mm 235/60/18 107v (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Outer Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge on 1.6-2mm 235/60/18 107v (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Inner Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Offside Front Inner Tyre has ply or cords exposed 235/60/18 107v (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge on 1.6-2mm 235/60/18 107v (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Outer Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge on 1.6-2mm 235/60/18 107v (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Outer Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge on 1.6-2mm 235/60/18 107v (5.2.3 (e))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Position lamp not working o/s/f (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arms front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
both head lamp lens starting to frost
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement n/s/f and o/s/f lower control arms front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Coil spring fractured or broken o/s/f (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam n/s (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread rear (0.1 (b))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement n/s/f lower arm front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Position lamp not working o/s/f (4.2.1 (a))
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread rear (0.1 (b))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement n/s/f lower arm front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a pin/bush n/s/r (2.4.G.2)
Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides rear (2.4.G.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit n/s/r (4.1.E.1)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both rear (3.5.1i)
Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm o/s/f (4.1.E.1)
Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a pin/bush n/s/r (2.4.G.2)
Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides rear (2.4.G.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit n/s/f and n/s/r (4.1.E.1)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both rear (3.5.1i)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear brake disc modified but not seriously weakened (3.5.1n)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit Both (4.1.E.1)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit Both (4.1.E.1)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Volvo XC60?
Based on 944,286 MOT tests across 100,002 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FV09 AGU is a 2009 Volvo XC60 in Grey with a 2,400cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.7%.
Across all 2009 Volvo XC60 models, the average MOT pass rate is 79.3% with a typical mileage of 90,717 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo XC60 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 4,822 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FV09 AGU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC60 typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 17 years old, this Volvo XC60 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FV09 AGU?
You can check the full history of FV09 AGU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FV09 AGU registered?
FV09 AGU is a 2009 Volvo XC60, first registered on 30 April 2009.
Is FV09 AGU safe to buy?
The MOT history for FV09 AGU shows 19 tests with a 73.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FV09 AGU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FV09 AGU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.