MOT Status
ValidMileage
107,383 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed second row (7.1.2 (b))
Offside Rear Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed second row (7.1.2 (b))
Rear Subframe mounting repair covered in underseal (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed second row (7.1.2 (b))
Offside Rear Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed second row (7.1.2 (b))
Rear Subframe mounting repair covered in underseal (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both (5.2.3 (e))
Rear not able to fully inspect rear brake pads
Rear unable to fully test boot rear passenger seat belts
Auxiliary drivebelt extremely noisy.
Rear cabin area: Seat and seatbelt inspection cannot be carried out. Centre row seats are facing rearward, ergo no belts available to inspect, and third row seats are stowed folded and forward, with a load behind them.
Subframe mounting repair covered in underseal Rear crossmember. Due to the thickness and type of sealant, I am unable to assess the completeness of the welded repairs, which I believe to be inadequate. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened Both sides forward longitudinal rails, inner faces perforated, outer faces have obvious thinning of parent metal. Prior repairs present, however these are covered in a silicon type sealer, and I cannot assess the quality. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Road wheel badly distorted Affecting the shape of the outer sidewall of the tyre. (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Outer face of chassis leg box section. Visible through wheelarch. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is inadequately repaired Crossmember above offside rear spring. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded to the extent that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected Nearside crossmember above spring is corroded and perforated. Offside is corroded and slightly perforated, but hidden behind prior repair. (5.3.6 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Auxiliary drivebelt extremely noisy.
Nearside Headlamp aim too far to the right (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Headlamp aim too low Main beam (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Rear cabin area: Seat and seatbelt inspection cannot be carried out. Centre row seats are facing rearward, ergo no belts available to inspect, and third row seats are stowed folded and forward, with a load behind them.
Subframe mounting repair covered in underseal Rear crossmember. Due to the thickness and type of sealant, I am unable to assess the completeness of the welded repairs, which I believe to be inadequate. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Power steering pipe/hose has slight seepage On top on front subframe (2.1.5 (a))
Offside Rear Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Power steering pipe/hose slightly corroded Front near subframe (2.1.5 (g) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim not tested (4.1.2 (b))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn Outer joint (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn Outer joint (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Power steering pipe/hose has slight seepage On top on front subframe (2.1.5 (a))
Offside Rear Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Only one rear single seat assembly fitted in vehicle behind the drivers and front passengers seats
Power steering pipe/hose slightly corroded Front near subframe (2.1.5 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Rear both rear axel bushes have exsses mouvment
gear shift leaver has excessive movement making identifing neutral difficult
Central Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear both rear axel bushes have exsses mouvment
gear shift leaver has excessive movement making identifing neutral difficult
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit outer edge (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit inner edge (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit outer edge (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit inner edge (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit 2mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit 3mm (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ssangyong Rodius 270 S?
Based on 772 MOT tests across 166 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FX62 DTY is a 2012 Ssangyong Rodius 270 S in Black with a 2,696cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.1%.
Across all 2012 Ssangyong Rodius 270 S models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.8% with a typical mileage of 55,986 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ssangyong Rodius 270 S fails its MOT is track rod end ball joint has excessive play, accounting for 10 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FX62 DTY, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ssangyong Rodius 270 S typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 14 years old, this Ssangyong Rodius 270 S is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FX62 DTY?
You can check the full history of FX62 DTY by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FX62 DTY registered?
FX62 DTY is a 2012 Ssangyong Rodius 270 S, first registered on 31 October 2012.
Is FX62 DTY safe to buy?
The MOT history for FX62 DTY shows 18 tests with a 61.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FX62 DTY have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FX62 DTY. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.