MOT Status
ValidMileage
71,665 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both sides inner edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both sides wishbones (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both sides inner edges (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both sides wishbones (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear wishbone (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt wishbone (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear wishbone (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear wishbone (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside front inner face. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside rear inner face. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Coil spring corroded bothside rear lower section. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced and rear. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced bothside rear inner sills. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated lightly damaged. (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened bothside front lower suspension arm (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both (5.2.3 (e))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside front inner face. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated lightly cracking. (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front wing lightly damaged.
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing bothside rear and inner shoulder worn thin, should replace. (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
centre section to rear exhaust system corroded.
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken lower section broken. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt insecure ,secure or replace. (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside front inner face. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated lightly cracking. (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front wing lightly damaged.
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing bothside rear and inner shoulder worn thin, should replace. (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
centre section to rear exhaust system corroded.
Offside Front Tyre wearing on inner edge
front brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
front brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
corrosion on brake discs in places
exhaust hangers corroding
slight uneven rear brake application
undertrays and engine covers fitted
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour coloured bulb faded (1.4.A.2f)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
corrosion on brake discs in places
exhaust hangers corroding
slight uneven rear brake application
undertrays and engine covers fitted
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Volvo C70?
Based on 351,562 MOT tests across 21,746 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FY09 GVK is a 2009 Volvo C70 in Blue with a 1,997cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65.2%.
Across all 2009 Volvo C70 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.3% with a typical mileage of 67,241 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo C70 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 11,186 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FY09 GVK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo C70 typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 17 years old, this Volvo C70 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FY09 GVK?
You can check the full history of FY09 GVK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FY09 GVK registered?
FY09 GVK is a 2009 Volvo C70, first registered on 31 March 2009.
Is FY09 GVK safe to buy?
The MOT history for FY09 GVK shows 23 tests with a 65.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FY09 GVK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FY09 GVK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.