MOT Status
ValidMileage
71,961 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Both wheel arches. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill/Jacking post (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Exhaust emits excessive smoke or vapour but not likely to obscure the vision of other road users (8.2.2.2 (c))
Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced BOTH wheel arches. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Marked with chalk. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Marked with chalk. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Exhaust emits excessive smoke or vapour but not likely to obscure the vision of other road users (8.2.2.2 (c))
Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced BOTH wheel arches. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (l))
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Of SILL. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Chassis rail. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced BOTH front wheel arches. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Central Stop lamp(s) with a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning High level. (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Of SILL. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Chassis rail. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced BOTH front wheel arches. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
COVERED IN UNDERSEAL THROUGHOUT
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced BOTH FRONT LEGS (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front of vehicle heavily undersealed
N/S/F and O/S/F Strut top surrounding area has surface corrosion
O/S/R of cab area (cill) has corrosion and holed, not near prescribed area
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Entrance/exit step in a deteriorated condition Slight corrosion underneath (9.7 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake prescribed area is excessively corroded Behind front shock absorber (1.1.21 (e) (i))
Offside Front Brake prescribed area is excessively corroded inner wheel arch (1.1.21 (e) (i))
Nearside Front Passenger's seat insecure (6.2.6 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Entrance/exit step in a deteriorated condition Slight corrosion underneath (9.7 (a) (i))
reverse lights not working
Nearside Headlamp aim too far to the left (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp light intensity severely reduced water ingress (4.1.4 (a))
Offside Headlamps matched pair are incorrectly positioned kick out to the right (4.1.4 (a))
Offside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
reverse lights not working
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front headlight deteriorated
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
exhaust rusty
nearside handbrake low reading
rear inner arches corroded
rear tyres perished
Brakes imbalanced across an axle 28% (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill (5.2.6)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outrigger (2.4.A.3)
Offside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
exhaust system corroded
Offside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
exhaust system corroded
exhaust silencer boxes corroded
n/s/f and o/s/f wiper blades split/perished
both headlamp aims almost too low, unable to adjust any further
Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively chafed (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
How Reliable is the Fiat Burstner?
Based on 6,723 MOT tests across 1,028 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
FY52 TVL is a 2002 Fiat Burstner in White with a 2,800cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 28 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2002 Fiat Burstner models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.1% with a typical mileage of 43,014 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Fiat Burstner fails its MOT is windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively, accounting for 16 recorded failures. If you're considering buying FY52 TVL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat Burstner typically stays on UK roads for around 24 years. At 24 years old, this Fiat Burstner is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of FY52 TVL?
You can check the full history of FY52 TVL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was FY52 TVL registered?
FY52 TVL is a 2002 Fiat Burstner, first registered on 3 December 2002.
Is FY52 TVL safe to buy?
The MOT history for FY52 TVL shows 28 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does FY52 TVL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on FY52 TVL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.