MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
50,207 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
OIL LEAK FROM ENGINE AREA
Nearside Front All position lamps not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear All position lamps not working (1.1.A.3b)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
OIL LEAK FROM ENGINE AREA
front leaf spring corroded
rear coil springs slightly corroded
rear driveshaft oil seals weeping slightly
Front Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Gearbox rubber mountings worn . Gear linkage rubber worn.
NS headlamp slightly deteriorated.
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Windscreen scored nad wiper blades noisey in operation.
Witness of tyre contact with arch.Good clearnce present during lock to lock check?
Engine/gearbox mountings worn.
Front Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Front tyres showing signs of contact with arch. Not found during lock to lock check.Good clearance present.
Gear linkage rubber bonded section deteriorated.
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Wiper blades perished.[noisey]. Windscreen scored.
Engine/gearbox mountings worn.
Front Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Front tyres showing signs of contact with arch. Not found during lock to lock check.Good clearance present.
Gear linkage rubber bonded section deteriorated.
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Wiper blades perished.[noisey]. Windscreen scored.
Gearbox rubber mounting broken.
Light damage to nsf tyre tread.
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Windscreen scored.
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.5c)
Gearbox rubber mounting broken.
Light damage to nsf tyre tread.
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Windscreen scored.
centre front floor rusty
front chassis rusting by leaf spring
oil leak
rear spring seats rusty
slight play in n/s/f king pin
slight play in steering box
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Rear rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Nearside Rear rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively damaged (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
centre front floor rusty
front chassis rusting by leaf spring
oil leak
rear spring seats rusty
slight play in n/s/f king pin
slight play in steering box
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is inadequately repaired (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Suspension has inadequate clearance with the chassis (2.4.A.1a)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe inadequately clipped (3.6.B.1)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is inadequately repaired (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Suspension has inadequate clearance with the chassis (2.4.A.1a)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Horn not working (1.6.2a) DANGEROUS
front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2) DANGEROUS
brake pedal rubber worn...
general body repairs noted...
o/s/f & o/s/r wheel rims distorted...
wipers smear...
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is inadequately repaired (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Brake pedal anti-slip provision worn smooth (3.3.A.1b) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3) DANGEROUS
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3) DANGEROUS
n/s & o/s/f suspension bushes worn....
corrosion n/s/f with in 30 cm of steering componant, advise attension.....
floor panals spot welded ....
o/s/f , n/s/r & o/s/r inner wheel rims distorted....
suspect welding repairs noted....
How Reliable is the Fiat 500 L?
Based on 57,177 MOT tests across 4,612 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
GOU 378K is a 1972 Fiat 500 L in White with a 875cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 52.9%.
Across all 1972 Fiat 500 L models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.9% with a typical mileage of 50,202 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Fiat 500 L fails its MOT is windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively, accounting for 663 recorded failures. If you're considering buying GOU 378K, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat 500 L typically stays on UK roads for around 15 years. At 54 years old, this Fiat 500 L is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of GOU 378K?
You can check the full history of GOU 378K by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was GOU 378K registered?
GOU 378K is a 1972 Fiat 500 L, first registered on 16 June 1972.
Is GOU 378K safe to buy?
The MOT history for GOU 378K shows 17 tests with a 52.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does GOU 378K have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on GOU 378K. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.