MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
93,043 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Entire vehicle structure is corodded and covered in underseal, Including all suspension components and sub-frames (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Vertical section of rack mounting crossmember. Visible within wheelarch. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Inner wing, notably around engine mounting bracket securing bolts. Marked in wheelarch. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front suspension components and sheet metal work have been painted in underseal, and although corrosion is present, I am unable to fully inspect these areas.
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Horizontal section of rack mounting crossmember. Partially hidden by longitudinal brace. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis rail, above driveshaft/below engine mounting. Restricted access/vision. Unable to fully inspect. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Both sides front struts have notable internal movement when extended.
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Also mounting points on vehicle. Very difficult to access due to covers. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Offside rear chassis, notably above driveshaft. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake lagging in operation 41% recorded difference. (1.2.1 (d))
Both sides front struts have notable internal movement when extended.
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Also mounting points on vehicle. Very difficult to access due to covers. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Parking brake lever defective but can be satisfactorily operated Appears loosely mounted. (1.1.6 (d))
Service brake binding but not excessively Both sides front (1.2.1 (f))
Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively Both sides front (1.2.1 (e))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Offside rear chassis, notably above driveshaft. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Thick underseal covering underside, making a thorough inspection difficult. Corrosion noted in these areas. Front subframe and forward chassis legs. Steering rack crossmember. Offside rear chassis rail.
Corrosion noted on front crossmember, underneath cooling radiator. This is within 30cm of suspension components, and is part of the prescribed area. Unable to carry out more than a visual check due to the shielded position of this corrosion.
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre Also wearing close om inner edge. ()
On front chassis legs, both sides. Stanchions for attaching subframe/crossmember, have visible corrosion.
Underside of vehicle coated in thick black underseal/paint, rendering full inspection of structure and suspension steering components very difficult/impossible.
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment (1.1.6 (c))
Corrosion noted on front crossmember, underneath cooling radiator. This is within 30cm of suspension components, and is part of the prescribed area. Unable to carry out more than a visual check due to the shielded position of this corrosion.
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 25% imbalance recorded. Also lagging on offside, but within permitted range. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Glazed and surface lightly scored. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre Also wearing close om inner edge. ()
On front chassis legs, both sides. Stanchions for attaching subframe/crossmember, have visible corrosion.
Underside of vehicle coated in thick black underseal/paint, rendering full inspection of structure and suspension steering components very difficult/impossible.
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened o/s and n/s (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material o/s and n/s (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instructions o/s and n/s wrong rotation (5.2.3 (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened o/s and n/s (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective o/s and n/s (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material o/s and n/s (1.1.11 (c))
Front coil spring corroded o/s and n/s (2.4.C.1b)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
o/s and n/s rear suspension components corroded including coil springs
Offside Rear Brake hose twisted and fouling on inside edge of wheel (3.6.B.4c)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Front coil spring corroded o/s and n/s (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
engine management light on
o/s and n/s rear suspension components corroded including coil springs
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded o/s and n/s (3.6.B.2c)
Front coil spring corroded o/s and n/s (2.4.C.1b)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced o/s and n/s (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
engine management light on
Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
offside front brake starting to bind
offside front to rear brake pipe corroded
rear brake discs corroded
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Toyota MR2?
Based on 602,130 MOT tests across 48,586 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
GP56 PPF is a 2006 Toyota MR2 in Silver with a 1,794cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2006 Toyota MR2 models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.8% with a typical mileage of 51,361 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota MR2 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 36,842 recorded failures. If you're considering buying GP56 PPF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota MR2 typically stays on UK roads for around 40 years. At 20 years old, this Toyota MR2 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of GP56 PPF?
You can check the full history of GP56 PPF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was GP56 PPF registered?
GP56 PPF is a 2006 Toyota MR2, first registered on 15 December 2006.
Is GP56 PPF safe to buy?
The MOT history for GP56 PPF shows 21 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does GP56 PPF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on GP56 PPF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.