MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
89,034 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded to the extent that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected (5.3.6 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Position lamp with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning (4.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
175/65/R14/82T.
175/65/R14/82T.
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
175/65/R14/82T. OF 4 OR 6 NR 4 NF 5mm.
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Recommend service inspection to equalise balance & efficiency. (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement nearside and offside rear bushes deterioration (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower windscreen damage
Nearside Rear tyre sidewall surface perishing and valve slight damaged
Rear Coil spring corroded nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened spring mounting areas (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear back box out skin deteriorated
hand brake cables outer casings damaged
oil level empty requires oil
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush upper bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush upper bush (5.3.2 (c))
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement nearside and offside rear bushes deterioration (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower windscreen damage
Nearside Rear tyre sidewall surface perishing and valve slight damaged
Rear Coil spring corroded nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened spring mounting areas (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear back box out skin deteriorated
hand brake cables outer casings damaged
oil level empty requires oil
Nearside Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust poor
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust poor
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
rear exhaust box corroded not blowing
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear exhaust box corroded
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
o/s/r and n/s/r outer handbrake cable outer casing cracked
rear tyres cracked
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
rear exhaust box corroded
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
GY09 TWD is a 2009 Ford Ka in Grey with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 50,765 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying GY09 TWD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of GY09 TWD?
You can check the full history of GY09 TWD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was GY09 TWD registered?
GY09 TWD is a 2009 Ford Ka, first registered on 5 June 2009.
Is GY09 TWD safe to buy?
The MOT history for GY09 TWD shows 16 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does GY09 TWD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on GY09 TWD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.