MOT Status
ValidMileage
103,175 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Both (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both arms rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Lower Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Cross member which the suspension arms mount to (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis rail under car (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Inner Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security Both sills within 30cm of suspension mounting (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both front suspension arm mounting areas (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened Has a hole on the offside front (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Both (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both arms rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Lower Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Cross member which the suspension arms mount to (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis rail under car (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Inner Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security Both sills within 30cm of suspension mounting (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both front suspension arm mounting areas (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Shock absorber casings & coil springs corroded
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Offside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Front Coil spring corroded both have heavy corrosion (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear lower wish bone arm rubbers splitting (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both have heavy corrosion (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side very little effort (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Front Coil spring corroded both have heavy corrosion (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear lower wish bone arm rubbers splitting (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both have heavy corrosion (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded all four (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear low effort from handbrake
Offside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side pulling only 13kgf (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Coil spring corroded all four (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear low effort from handbrake
Offside Front Slight movement in seat belt receiver attachment.
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Surface corrosion on suspension components.
Both front fog lamps broken.
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Both front fog lamps broken.
Front fog lamps damaged offside inoperative
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
under trays fitted obscuring components
Damage To Both Front Fog Lamps
Engine Covers And Undertray's Fitted
Nearside Rear Tyre Nearing The Legal Limit
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Surface corrosion on suspension components.
Inner Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
free play on handbrake
How Reliable is the Toyota MR2?
Based on 602,130 MOT tests across 48,586 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
GY54 SZO is a 2004 Toyota MR2 in Silver with a 1,794cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 79.2%.
Across all 2004 Toyota MR2 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.8% with a typical mileage of 63,331 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Toyota MR2 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 36,842 recorded failures. If you're considering buying GY54 SZO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota MR2 typically stays on UK roads for around 40 years. At 22 years old, this Toyota MR2 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of GY54 SZO?
You can check the full history of GY54 SZO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was GY54 SZO registered?
GY54 SZO is a 2004 Toyota MR2, first registered on 27 September 2004.
Is GY54 SZO safe to buy?
The MOT history for GY54 SZO shows 24 tests with a 79.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does GY54 SZO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on GY54 SZO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.