MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
214,079 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive floor area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Hydraulic leak, but not excessive area possible power steering fluid (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear inner bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front wing starting to corrode
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
offside front floor to inner sill damaged
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
general rusting on all underbody panels
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit on 2mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit on 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive floor area also damaged (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit on 2mm (4.1.E.1)
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive subframe and surrounding chassisareas corroded and rusty ok for now (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front floor to sill damaged not within prescribrd area
Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive nearside and offsiderear subframe and mountings and rear inner sill areas (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Outer Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill area (2.4.A.3)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort handbrake (3.7.B.5a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Offside Front floor to sill damaged not within prescribrd area
Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive nearside and offsiderear subframe and mountings and rear inner sill areas (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside oilleaks
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner sill and chassis area (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Offside Rear rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside oilleaks
Oil leak
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
offrear brake binding slightly nearside and offside rear top suspension bushes slightly worn
nearside and offside rear suspension top ball joints have slight play nearside front brake binding slightly
Nearside Rear Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
offside rear light lens damaged
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
offside rear light lens damaged
both rear brakes binding slightly handbrake warning light illuminated offsidefront top wishbone ball joint gaitor split
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
both rear brakes binding slightly handbrake warning light illuminated offsidefront top wishbone ball joint gaitor split
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
nearsibe front brake backplate missing also front brakes poor pad to disc contact
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Upper Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Upper Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Braking system leaking (3.6.A.1) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
How Reliable is the Lexus LS400?
Based on 81,011 MOT tests across 7,294 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
H4 WFA is a 1992 Lexus LS400 in White with a 3,969cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 1992 Lexus LS400 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.4% with a typical mileage of 140,259 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Lexus LS400 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 4,048 recorded failures. If you're considering buying H4 WFA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Lexus LS400 typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 34 years old, this Lexus LS400 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of H4 WFA?
You can check the full history of H4 WFA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was H4 WFA registered?
H4 WFA is a 1992 Lexus LS400, first registered on 18 August 1992.
Is H4 WFA safe to buy?
The MOT history for H4 WFA shows 20 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does H4 WFA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on H4 WFA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.