MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
96,805 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment all suspension top mounts (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear tyre is perished
Nearside Rear wheel arch has corroded heavily
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak ()
body showing signs of corrosion
both outer sills have corroded
Body showing signs of corrosion
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit on 2mm in the centre (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit on 3mm (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak engine oil ()
Rear axle mounts have corroded heavily
Rear coil spring corroded both springs (2.4.C.1b)
Both rear tyres slightly feathered
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both outer sills (2.4.A.3)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both outer sills (5.2.6)
oil leak
Nearside Rear Brake pipe inadequately clipped (3.6.B.1)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Both rear tyres slightly feathered
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both outer sills (2.4.A.3)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both outer sills (5.2.6)
oil leak
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Oil leak
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Vehicle's internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Oil leak
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Vehicle's internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights
Oil leak
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
both front tyre treads perished
front pads getting low
n/s/f tyre worn on inner edges
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
battery leaking acid
Offside Front coil spring cracked (2.4.C.1a)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
battery leaking acid
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Power steering pump has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Centre Front Windscreen has a sticker or other obstruction encroaching into the swept area by more than 40mm outside zone 'A' (8.3.1e)
Oil leak
rear tyres stepped
Oil leak
rear tyres stepped
Nearside front lower suspension arm bush badly splitting out
Offside front flexible brake hose slightly twisted.
STRONG ADVISE: Signs of a power steering leak from pump area.
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HF02 NFN is a 2002 Ford Puma in Grey with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.8%.
Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HF02 NFN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HF02 NFN?
You can check the full history of HF02 NFN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HF02 NFN registered?
HF02 NFN is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 28 March 2002.
Is HF02 NFN safe to buy?
The MOT history for HF02 NFN shows 18 tests with a 77.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HF02 NFN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HF02 NFN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.