MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
39,296 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Front Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Main Under carriage of frame area. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Cracked. (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Cracked. (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit Worn un even, suspect low pressure. (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake effort inadequate at a wheel Lever coming back to handle bar, slack. (1.2.1 (a) (i))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick Down to metal. (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Central Front Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Main Under carriage of frame area. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Cracked. (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Cracked. (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit Worn un even, suspect low pressure. (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Under tray corroding (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Rear Brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Under tray corroding (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Low tyre pressure
Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied Rear (1.1.2 (d))
Front Brake indicates a slightly grabbing brake (1.2.1 (c))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Cracked (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied Rear (1.1.2 (d))
Front Brake indicates a slightly grabbing brake (1.2.1 (c))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Cracked (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
nearside bodywork damaged
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the handling (2.4 (a))
Wheel fixing missing (multiple fixings) (x3) front wheel mounting bolts missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
nearside bodywork damaged
Headlamp aim so that beam "kick up" is not visible on the screen dipping to incorrect side (4.1.2 (a))
Steering headbearing excessively stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the handling (2.4 (a))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
nearside bodywork damaged
Rear Wheel alignment slightly misaligned to the right (2.4 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Offside Rear Rear suspension bush deteriorated but not excessively front swing arm bush (2.4.A2a(i))
Rear Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. to the right (2.5.1)
Nearside Front Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
How Reliable is the Piaggio Vespa?
Based on 355,016 MOT tests across 47,189 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HF13 FSP is a 2013 Piaggio Vespa in Black with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 57.1%.
Across all 2013 Piaggio Vespa models, the average MOT pass rate is 87.1% with a typical mileage of 9,170 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Piaggio Vespa fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 6,210 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HF13 FSP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Piaggio Vespa typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 13 years old, this Piaggio Vespa is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HF13 FSP?
You can check the full history of HF13 FSP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HF13 FSP registered?
HF13 FSP is a 2013 Piaggio Vespa, first registered on 24 May 2013.
Is HF13 FSP safe to buy?
The MOT history for HF13 FSP shows 14 tests with a 57.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HF13 FSP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HF13 FSP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.