MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
26,625 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Direction indicator not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Tyre valve stem damaged which could cause sudden tyre deflation (4.1.2c)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Lower Rear suspension bearing has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear position lamp obscured but not more than 50% (1.1.1d)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear Roller brake test Higher brake efficiency normally obtainable. (3.3.A2b)
Rear position lamp obscured but not more than 50% (1.1.1d)
Roller brake test Higher brake efficiency normally obtainable. (3.3.A2b)
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Headlamp slightly discoloured (1.2.1)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Headlamp slightly discoloured (1.2.1)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii)) DANGEROUS
Front wheel bearings are excessively rough (2.3.5b) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake pad(s) (sintered type) less than 1.0mm thick (3.2A1f(ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Front wheel bearings have excessive free play (2.3.5b) DANGEROUS
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front wheel bearings are slightly rough (2.3.5b)
Nearside Rear Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d)
Headlamp aim too high (1.6)
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on main beam (1.2.2a(ii))
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Rear suspension fouling which affects the movement of the rear suspension (2.4.A.3a)
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the handling (2.5.1)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front wheel bearings are slightly rough (2.3.5b)
Nearside Rear Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust markings indicating not for road use or similar wording (7.1.4)
Fairings so located that it is likely to impede the steering (2.1.2e)
Front Brake caliper(s) securing bolt(s) missing (3.2.A1j)
Nearside Front Direction indicator not working (1.5.1c)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
One brake light is in/op
Rear tyre is flat
How Reliable is the Cagiva MITO-125?
Based on 4,171 MOT tests across 712 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HF55 EDO is a 2005 Cagiva MITO-125 in Red with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 56.3%.
Across all 2005 Cagiva MITO-125 models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.6% with a typical mileage of 16,054 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Cagiva MITO-125 fails its MOT is stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies, accounting for 220 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HF55 EDO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Cagiva MITO-125 typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 21 years old, this Cagiva MITO-125 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HF55 EDO?
You can check the full history of HF55 EDO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HF55 EDO registered?
HF55 EDO is a 2005 Cagiva MITO-125, first registered on 24 September 2005.
Is HF55 EDO safe to buy?
The MOT history for HF55 EDO shows 16 tests with a 56.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HF55 EDO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HF55 EDO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.