MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
13,293 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases small hole in end can (6.1.2 (a))
Exhaust not fitted fully, but secure
Rear fender insecure
Brake effort inadequate at a wheel Rear brake inadequate to lock (1.2.1 (a) (i))
Handlebar fouling on the fuel tank or bodywork on full lock Front fairing insecure (2.1.4 (b))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak N/S front fork leaking (5.3.2 (b))
Shock absorber has negligible damping effect no rebound to forks (5.3.2 (b))
Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instructions Front tyre rotation incorrect (5.2.3 (i))
Brake hose slightly twisted front brake hose not attached, caught in steering (1.1.12 (b) (i))
Exhaust not fitted fully, but secure
Rear fender insecure
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel (1.1.2 (a))
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Inner Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front tyre cracking on side wall
body work obstructing view of components
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake hose excessively chafed (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Handlebar retaining device loose (2.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Tyre designed for front wheel use fitted to the rear wheel (5.2.3 (a))
Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
How Reliable is the Peugeot Kisbee?
Based on 15,126 MOT tests across 3,447 vehicles.
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HF65 WAA is a 2015 Peugeot Kisbee in Red with a 49cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 10 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2015 Peugeot Kisbee models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.2% with a typical mileage of 9,157 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The Peugeot Kisbee typically stays on UK roads for around 16 years. At 11 years old, this Peugeot Kisbee is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HF65 WAA?
You can check the full history of HF65 WAA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HF65 WAA registered?
HF65 WAA is a 2015 Peugeot Kisbee, first registered on 22 September 2015.
Is HF65 WAA safe to buy?
The MOT history for HF65 WAA shows 10 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HF65 WAA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HF65 WAA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.