MOT Status
ValidMileage
100,520 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Trailing arm bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Trailing arm bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Lower arm rear most bush starting to perish and crack (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Front most rear trail arm bush starting to perish away from metal casing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Lower arm rear most bush starting to perish and crack (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Front most rear trail arm bush starting to perish away from metal casing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements Incorrect spacings (0.1 (d))
Nearside Front Headlamp cleaning device for LED or HID headlamp inoperative (4.1.6 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp cleaning device for LED or HID headlamp inoperative (4.1.6 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp missing (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements incorrect spacings (0.1 (d))
Offside Front Outer Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Lower arm rear most bush starting to perish and crack (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Front most rear trail arm bush starting to perish away from metal casing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Lower arm rear most bush starting to perish and crack (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Front most rear trail arm bush starting to perish away from metal casing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
registration plates fading
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
registration plates fading
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread front and rear (0.1 (b))
rear seats not in car at time of test (belts not checked)
Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test rear both seats folded ()
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front and rear (3.5.1i)
engine covers and undertrays fitted
registration plate faded but not likely to be misread both front and rear (6.3.1d)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords heavily perished, heavily cracked and 2 nails in 225/55/18 (4.1.D.1a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit both sides 225/55/18 (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit perished and cracked 225/55/18 (4.1.E.1)
Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test rear both seats folded ()
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front and rear (3.5.1i)
engine covers and undertrays fitted
registration plate faded but not likely to be misread both front and rear (6.3.1d)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit both sides, nearside closer 225/55/18 (4.1.E.1)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (3.5.1i)
both rear tyres perished and cracking 225/55/18
engine covers and undertrays fitted
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
How Reliable is the Peugeot 4007?
Based on 41,318 MOT tests across 2,609 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HG10 ETE is a 2010 Peugeot 4007 in Silver with a 2,179cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.2%.
Across all 2010 Peugeot 4007 models, the average MOT pass rate is 76.4% with a typical mileage of 79,943 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot 4007 fails its MOT is track rod end ball joint has excessive play, accounting for 681 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HG10 ETE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 4007 typically stays on UK roads for around 19 years. At 16 years old, this Peugeot 4007 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HG10 ETE?
You can check the full history of HG10 ETE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HG10 ETE registered?
HG10 ETE is a 2010 Peugeot 4007, first registered on 30 March 2010.
Is HG10 ETE safe to buy?
The MOT history for HG10 ETE shows 18 tests with a 72.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HG10 ETE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HG10 ETE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.