MOT Status
ValidMileage
124,254 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Handbrake long
Hazard warning switch insecure (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring modified but not seriously weakened both rubber mounts missing (5.3.1 (d) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened axle (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Both front sections of plastic inner wheel arch missing
Front Headlamp has a product on the light source but not seriously reducing light output Both lamps, which include the indicator and position lamps (4.1.4 (b))
Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play Both joints (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Hazard warning switch insecure (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Coil spring modified but not seriously weakened No seating rubbers at rear, also front springs are modified (5.3.1 (d) (i))
Rear Exhaust heat shield loose
Rear Position lamp has a product on the lens or light source but not adversely affecting light intensity Both lamps, wich include stop and indicator lamps (4.2.3 (b) (ii))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened Front section (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn Lower arm outer balljoint. and cover/boot open. Also rear bush worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Both front sections of plastic inner wheel arch missing
Front Headlamp has a product on the light source but not seriously reducing light output Both lamps, which include the indicator and position lamps (4.1.4 (b))
Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play Both joints (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Hazard warning switch insecure (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Coil spring modified but not seriously weakened No seating rubbers at rear, also front springs are modified (5.3.1 (d) (i))
Rear Exhaust heat shield loose
Rear Position lamp has a product on the lens or light source but not adversely affecting light intensity Both lamps, wich include stop and indicator lamps (4.2.3 (b) (ii))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front radiator support corroded
Rear Upper Coil spring modified but not seriously weakened rubber locators (5.3.1 (d) (i))
after market wiring loosely fitted below vehicle
all lights tinted but light output not reduced
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front radiator support corroded
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Upper Coil spring modified but not seriously weakened rubber locators (5.3.1 (d) (i))
after market wiring loosely fitted below vehicle
all lights tinted but light output not reduced
Rear coil spring retainers missing
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment (1.1.6 (c))
Windscreen in such a condition that visibility through swept area is seriously affected (3.2 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear coil spring retainers missing
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively nearside and offside (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) nearside and offside ()
Oil leak, but not excessive from oil filter (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play nearside and offside (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively nearside and offside (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) nearside and offside ()
Oil leak, but not excessive from oil filter (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
near side mirror glass cracked
How Reliable is the Renault Clio?
Based on 14,729,048 MOT tests across 1,134,954 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HK59 FZF is a 2010 Renault Clio in Red with a 1,149cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2010 Renault Clio models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.3% with a typical mileage of 57,999 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Renault Clio fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 660,730 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HK59 FZF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Renault Clio typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 16 years old, this Renault Clio is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HK59 FZF?
You can check the full history of HK59 FZF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HK59 FZF registered?
HK59 FZF is a 2010 Renault Clio, first registered on 27 January 2010.
Is HK59 FZF safe to buy?
The MOT history for HK59 FZF shows 21 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HK59 FZF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HK59 FZF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.