CarVerify

Free Car Check

HN02 TOU

2002 Suzuki GN125

Black Petrol 124cc
Search another vehicle

MOT Status

Valid
Expires2 Jul 2027
Tests30 (20 pass, 10 fail)
Pass rate66.7%

Mileage

Typical for 2002 Suzuki GN12514,391 mi
4 checks still locked for this Suzuki
Stolen
Finance
Write-off
Keepers
Unlock full report — £4.99
Instant £30k guarantee
or single check £9.99

Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.

Vehicle Details

RegistrationHN02 TOU
MakeSuzuki
ModelGN125
Year2002
ColourBlack
Fuel typePetrol
Engine124cc

All premium checks include

50+ data points
Finance Check (Experian) Insurance Write-off Salvage Auction Stolen Check Previous Owners Ex-Taxi, Police, NHS Mileage Anomaly Import / Export Scrapped Check Plate Changes

MOT History

20 pass 10 fail
Pass 15 Jun 2026

Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))

Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))

Front fender missing

Motorcycle structure is modified but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced brake mountings (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Motorcycle structure is modified but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame and swing arm (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced brake mountings (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame and swing arm (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))

customer aware of potential issues with modified structure

Fail 15 Jun 2026

Exhaust noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar motorcycle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition (8.1.1 (a))

Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))

Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))

Front fender missing

Motorcycle structure is modified but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced brake mountings (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Motorcycle structure is modified but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame and swing arm (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced brake mountings (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame and swing arm (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Position lamp missing (4.2.1 (a))

Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))

Rear reflector missing (4.8.2 (a) (ii))

Registration plate incorrect (0.1 (c))

Registration plate lamp missing in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))

customer aware of potential issues with modified structure

Pass 3 Jul 2025

Drive chain slightly tight tight spots (6.1.7 (k) (i))

Exhaust noisy exhaust baffles fitted for test (8.1.1 (a))

Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))

Motorcycle structure is modified but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Frame, mounts and brackets - discussed and shown to owner (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Rear Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))

Rear Brake caliper travel close to excessive (1.1.16 (e) (i))

Rear Motorcycle structure is deformed but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced rear brake caliper mounting bracket (6.1.1 (a) (i))

Rear Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced rear brake caliper mounting (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))

drive chain runs very close to frame

this motorcycle has many custom and non original parts, all of which have been identified and shown to the owner

Fail 3 Jul 2025

Drive chain horseshoe locking device incorrectly fitted (6.1.7 (j) (i))

Drive chain slightly tight tight spots (6.1.7 (k) (i))

Exhaust noisy exhaust baffles fitted for test (8.1.1 (a))

Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))

Motorcycle structure is modified but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Frame, mounts and brackets - discussed and shown to owner (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Rear Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))

Rear Brake caliper travel close to excessive (1.1.16 (e) (i))

Rear Motorcycle structure is deformed but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced rear brake caliper mounting bracket (6.1.1 (a) (i))

Rear Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced rear brake caliper mounting (6.1.1 (d) (i))

Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))

drive chain runs very close to frame

this motorcycle has many custom and non original parts, all of which have been identified and shown to the owner

Pass 28 Jun 2024
Fail 24 Jun 2024

Front Brake caliper insecure (1.1.16 (c) (i))

Front Stop lamp does not illuminate by the operation of both brake controls (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS

Pass 20 Jun 2023
Pass 24 Jun 2022

Indicator tell tale missing (4.9.1 (a) (i))

Registration plate slightly loose (0.1 (a))

Riders seat slightly loose (6.2.5 (a) (ii))

rear frame modified

slight play in rear cushdrive rubbers

Fail 16 Jun 2022

Front Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel (1.1.2 (a))

Front Direction indicator obviously incorrectly positioned n/s and o/s (4.4.3 (a))

Indicator tell tale missing (4.9.1 (a) (i))

Registration plate slightly loose (0.1 (a))

Riders seat slightly loose (6.2.5 (a) (ii))

rear frame modified

slight play in rear cushdrive rubbers

Fail 20 May 2022

All direction indicators missing (4.4.1 (a) (ii))

Exhaust noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar motorcycle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition (8.1.1 (a))

Front Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))

Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))

Fuel cap has sharp edges

Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))

Wheel alignment slightly misaligned (2.4 (a))

Headlight dipswitch positioned incorrectly so cannot to be operated safely

Horn button positioned incorrectly so cannot be operated safely

Pass 11 May 2021 16 miles

Chain guard missing

Front mudguard not fitted at time of test

Fuel cap has sharp edges

Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))

Fail 11 May 2021 16 miles

Chain guard missing

Drive chain horseshoe locking device incorrectly fitted (6.1.7 (j) (i))

Front mudguard not fitted at time of test

Fuel cap has sharp edges

Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))

Rear reflector missing (4.8.2 (a) (ii))

Pass 30 Apr 2019 47,072 miles

Chain guard missing

Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))

slight play in rear cushdrive rubbers

Pass 1 May 2018 45,536 miles

Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)

Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(i))

Pass 27 May 2017 43,874 miles
Pass 16 May 2016 33,844 miles
Pass 14 May 2015 31,289 miles
Fail 14 May 2014 28,343 miles

Drive chain slightly tight (6.2.1d)

Horn not working (1.7.3a)

Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)

Pass 14 May 2014 28,343 miles

Drive chain slightly tight (6.2.1d)

Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)

Pass 18 May 2013 25,506 miles
Pass 19 May 2012 22,561 miles
Fail 12 May 2012 22,493 miles

Rear suspension component excessively corroded. (2.4.A.1a)

Pass 21 May 2011 19,765 miles
Pass 29 May 2010 17,397 miles
Fail 22 May 2010 17,313 miles

Motorcycle structure excessively corroded (6.1.1a)

Pass 16 May 2009 14,391 miles
Pass 24 May 2008 11,332 miles
Fail 17 May 2008 11,258 miles

Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))

Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))

Pass 5 May 2007 8,421 miles
Pass 20 May 2006 5,576 miles

How Reliable is the Suzuki GN125?

Based on 18,615 MOT tests across 2,116 vehicles.

77.0%
Pass Rate
873
Miles/Year
33
Year Lifespan
2,116
On UK Roads

Top MOT Failure Points

Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm 292
Drive chain excessively loose 278
Drive chain worn to excess 243
Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies 218
shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil 217
Full Suzuki GN125 reliability report

Don't risk it. Know before you buy.

Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.

£30k guarantee Instant results Cancel anytime

HN02 TOU is a 2002 Suzuki GN125 in Black with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 30 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.

Across all 2002 Suzuki GN125 models, the average MOT pass rate is 78.5% with a typical mileage of 14,391 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.

The most common reason a Suzuki GN125 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 292 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HN02 TOU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.

The Suzuki GN125 typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 24 years old, this Suzuki GN125 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I check the history of HN02 TOU?

You can check the full history of HN02 TOU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.

What year was HN02 TOU registered?

HN02 TOU is a 2002 Suzuki GN125, first registered on 1 June 2002.

Is HN02 TOU safe to buy?

The MOT history for HN02 TOU shows 30 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.

Does HN02 TOU have outstanding finance?

Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HN02 TOU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.

No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.