MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
47,974 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Headlamp aim too low and too far to the right. (1.6)
Horn is not continous or uniform (1.7.3c)
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Front Brake fluid reservoir fluid level low (3.2.B1d)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Headlamp slightly discoloured (1.2.1)
Nearside Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Offside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Rear Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(i))
carried out roadtest bike tended to turn in quickly at low speeds on both locks, possiable it has a slight frame alignment fault,further investigation recommended.
front brake should work better than does at this moment,recommend brake system rebuild.
front end slightly twisted
main front down tube appears set back slightly
nearside rider footrest slightly bent up
spokes in rear wheel creaking when brake test carried out
severe oil leak from front of engine,which could get onto rear tyre.
Clutch lever bent (6.2.1g)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front position lamp damaged but function not impaired (1.1.1b)
Front position lamp slightly discoloured (1.1.2a)
Oil leak
Rear Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
handlebars slighly bent on nearside
nearside rider footrest bent also rubber insecure
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d)
Drive chain worn to excess (6.2.1e)
Front Brake lever cannot be applied smoothly (3.1.3d)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Headlamp aim too high and too far to the left. (1.6)
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on main beam (1.2.2a(ii))
Front Roller brake test indicates a severely grabbing brake (3.3.A1b) DANGEROUS
Clutch lever bent (6.2.1g)
Front Brake fluid reservoir fluid level low (3.2.B1d)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front position lamp damaged but function not impaired (1.1.1b)
Front position lamp slightly discoloured (1.1.2a)
Nearside Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Oil leak
Rear Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
handlebars slighly bent on nearside
nearside rider footrest bent also rubber insecure
no oil showing in level sight glass on engine
even though front brake locked at 51kg giving a 16% reading front brake does not feel right,i am unable to carry out road test to assess performance due to lack off oil in engine,in my opinion brake is unsatisfactory.
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on main beam (1.2.2a(ii))
Rear Wheel spoke cracked. (4.2.1b)
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the handling (2.5.1)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
How Reliable is the Kymco Pulsar?
Based on 3,412 MOT tests across 739 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HN52 FEG is a 2002 Kymco Pulsar in Red with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 9 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 55.6%.
Across all 2002 Kymco Pulsar models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.7% with a typical mileage of 13,733 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Kymco Pulsar fails its MOT is stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies, accounting for 82 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HN52 FEG, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Kymco Pulsar typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 24 years old, this Kymco Pulsar is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HN52 FEG?
You can check the full history of HN52 FEG by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HN52 FEG registered?
HN52 FEG is a 2002 Kymco Pulsar, first registered on 26 October 2002.
Is HN52 FEG safe to buy?
The MOT history for HN52 FEG shows 9 tests with a 55.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HN52 FEG have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HN52 FEG. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.