MOT Status
ValidMileage
71,209 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Offside Rear Seat belt retracting mechanism defective (7.1.2 (e))
Nearside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Edge worn (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Exhaust emissions exceed level of metered smoke for a turbo charged engine (8.2.2.2 (b))
Offside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Edge worn (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced o/s and n/s front outer sill panels, corroded, blistering,, recommend keep check (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive o/s and n/s rear inner sill panels, and inner sill ends (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front tyres, worn slightly on edges (5.2.3 (e))
undertrays etc fitted, limiting view of some testable items
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt drop/end link (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill panel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill panel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure tread starting to lose shape, tyre is 9 years old, has been repaired (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced o/s and n/s front outer sill panels, corroded, blistering,, recommend keep check (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play drop/end link,, recommend replace (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive o/s and n/s rear inner sill panels, and inner sill ends (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front tyres, worn slightly on edges (5.2.3 (e))
undertrays etc fitted, limiting view of some testable items
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced o/s and n/s rear inner sill panels corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced o/s and n/s rear outer sill panels, corrosion blisters,, recommend keep check (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
rear exhaust bracket deteriorated
undertrays fitted, limiting view to some testable items
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced o/s and n/s rear outer sill panels, signs of blistering (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights
undertrays etc fitted, limiting view of some testable items
Driver's view Items removed from driver's view prior to test (3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (h) (i))
rear wiper blade split
Both Front Brakes Binding
Nearside Rear Tyre Cracking
Both Front Brakes Binding
Nearside Rear Tyre Cracking
Offside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear silencer support binding corroded apart but silencer still well supported.
Rear wiper split.
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nail in offside rear tyre
Rear silencer support binding corroded apart but silencer still well supported.
Rear wiper split.
Exhaust emits an excessive level of metered smoke for a turbo charged engine (7.4.B.3b)
How Reliable is the Citroen Xsara Picasso?
Based on 11,608 MOT tests across 657 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HW08 FHP is a 2008 Citroen Xsara Picasso in Brown with a 1,560cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.7%.
Across all 2008 Citroen Xsara Picasso models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.9% with a typical mileage of 66,740 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Citroen Xsara Picasso fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 157 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HW08 FHP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Citroen Xsara Picasso typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 18 years old, this Citroen Xsara Picasso is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HW08 FHP?
You can check the full history of HW08 FHP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HW08 FHP registered?
HW08 FHP is a 2008 Citroen Xsara Picasso, first registered on 31 March 2008.
Is HW08 FHP safe to buy?
The MOT history for HW08 FHP shows 22 tests with a 72.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HW08 FHP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HW08 FHP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.