MOT Status
ValidMileage
64,679 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule both rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear (1.1.11 (c))
Front Exhaust silencer slightly loose flexi (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose slightly damaged not secure (1.1.12 (b) (i))
radiator insecure, front valance corroded, not considered structural
Nearside Headlamp insecure (4.1.1 (c))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule both rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear (1.1.11 (c))
Front Exhaust silencer slightly loose flexi (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose slightly damaged not secure (1.1.12 (b) (i))
radiator insecure, front valance corroded, not considered structural
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
underside of vehicle badly corroded not in prescribed areas
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule all brake ferrules corroded across vehicle (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Front radiator support beam rotted away
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
surface corrosion across front suspension components
surface corrosion across rear suspension components
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Inner Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule all brake ferrules corroded across vehicle (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Front radiator support beam rotted away
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
surface corrosion across front suspension components
surface corrosion across rear suspension components
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
all brake pipes and ferrules corroded
both rear tyres perishing and over 5 years old
centre exhaust rubber broken but still supported
front cross member, radiator support corroded
underside and suspension componants corroded
Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear (3.6.B.2c)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
bonnet stay/hinge damaged but bonnet can still be secured in a closed position
rear brake pipe unions/ ferrules corroded
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorber has an excessively worn bush (2.7.4)
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorber has an excessively worn bush (2.7.4)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear (3.6.B.2c)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
bonnet stay/hinge damaged but bonnet can still be secured in a closed position
rear brake pipe unions/ ferrules corroded
Central exhaust mounting broken but exhaust system secure
Nearside bonnet hinge damaged, recommend attention
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened o/s and n/s front brake discs, slightly lipped (3.5.1i)
centre and rear exhaust rubbers slightly perished
n/s front bonnet hinge, bonnet stay damaged,, recommend attention
o/s and n/s front tyres, worn slightly on inner edges
o/s front brake pads, look 2/3 worn
recommend check steering track
Headlamp aim too high o/as and n/s (1.8)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened o/s and n/s front brake discs, slightly lipped (3.5.1i)
centre and rear exhaust rubbers slightly perished
n/s front bonnet hinge, bonnet stay damaged,, recommend attention
o/s and n/s front tyres, worn slightly on inner edges
o/s front brake pads, look 2/3 worn
recommend check steering track
Bonnet prop badly damaged not operating correctly.
Both rear exhaust rubber support mounts perishing and cracking.
Front registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear Valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.D.1e)
O/S/F suspension top mount has flat spots but not affecting the steering.
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Bonnet prop badly damaged not operating correctly.
Both rear exhaust rubber support mounts perishing and cracking.
Front registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
N/S/F tyre starting to bauld on inner edge.
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.D.1e)
O/S/F suspension top mount has flat spots but not affecting the steering.
O/S/F tyre bauld on inner edge.
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Bonnet prop faulty.
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Rear Valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Bonnet prop bent.
Both rear tyres cracking and perishing.
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc's look low.
O/S/F tyre bauld on inner edge.
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear suspension resting on bumpstops.
How Reliable is the Citroen Nemo?
Based on 279,608 MOT tests across 21,949 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HW09 HWP is a 2009 Citroen Nemo in Blue with a 1,396cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.8%.
Across all 2009 Citroen Nemo models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.1% with a typical mileage of 76,934 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Citroen Nemo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 4,767 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HW09 HWP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Citroen Nemo typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 17 years old, this Citroen Nemo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HW09 HWP?
You can check the full history of HW09 HWP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HW09 HWP registered?
HW09 HWP is a 2009 Citroen Nemo, first registered on 31 May 2009.
Is HW09 HWP safe to buy?
The MOT history for HW09 HWP shows 16 tests with a 68.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HW09 HWP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HW09 HWP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.