MOT Status
ValidMileage
57,607 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush upper bush (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Coil spring corroded badly corroded/ rear beam axle corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside front inner face. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Coil spring corroded bothside rear badly corroded. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Driver's door cannot be opened from outside the vehicle (6.2.3 (a))
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect bothside front /lens tarnished , clean or replace. (4.1.2 (c))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside front inner face. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Coil spring corroded bothside rear badly corroded. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded bothside rear badly corroded. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Exhaust mounting defective metal support braked broken, still secure ,can be welded. (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced beam axel badly corroded. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush bothside rear upper bush. (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt and rear bush badly worn. (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Coil spring corroded bothside rear badly corroded. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Exhaust mounting defective metal support braked broken, still secure ,can be welded. (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (d))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush badly worn ,should be replaced. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced beam axel badly corroded. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush bothside rear upper bush. (5.3.2 (c))
Front Exhaust clamp needs welding (front near flexi pipe )/ rear exhaust box outer skin badly corroded,
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides lower suspension arm rear (inner bush) debonding (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides badly corroded in places (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear beam axle corroded and coil spring seat area
Nearside Rear Direction indicator not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side needs investigation (hand brake cable loose at drum end ) (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides badly corroded /worn should replace (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Exhaust clamp needs welding (front near flexi pipe )/ rear exhaust box outer skin badly corroded,
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides lower suspension arm rear (inner bush) debonding (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively needs attention / wheel bearing roughness could be checked (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides badly corroded in places (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear beam axle corroded and coil spring seat area
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
rear exhaust outer skin corroded
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
rear exhaust corroded
condition of rear exhaust
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
rear brakes release unevenly (3.7.B.4)
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
both front tyres devoid of tread on inner edges
front brake discs corroded
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Inner Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Fiat 500?
Based on 3,854,072 MOT tests across 331,691 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HW59 HXC is a 2009 Fiat 500 in Grey with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2009 Fiat 500 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.3% with a typical mileage of 55,298 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Fiat 500 fails its MOT is shock absorber has an excessively worn bush, accounting for 26,240 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HW59 HXC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat 500 typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 17 years old, this Fiat 500 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HW59 HXC?
You can check the full history of HW59 HXC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HW59 HXC registered?
HW59 HXC is a 2009 Fiat 500, first registered on 28 October 2009.
Is HW59 HXC safe to buy?
The MOT history for HW59 HXC shows 20 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HW59 HXC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HW59 HXC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.