MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
42,676 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Offside Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.5.1b)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Rear mono-shock pivot worn but not excessive (2.4.B.4)
headlamp taped for correct beam image
rear brake hose slightly damaged
Drive chain worn to excess (6.2.1e)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (1.6)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.5.1b)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Rear mono-shock pivot worn but not excessive (2.4.B.4)
rear brake hose slightly damaged
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
headlamp taped for correct beam image
offside mirror insecure
rear brake fluid reservoir hose damaged
rear brake hose slightly damaged
rear swing arm slightly damaged
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Headlamp aim not tested (1.6)
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.5.1b)
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.5.1b)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
offside mirror insecure
rear brake fluid reservoir hose damaged
rear brake hose slightly damaged
rear swing arm slightly damaged
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Front wheel bearings are slightly rough (2.3.5b)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Offside Front Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Drive chain slightly tight (6.2.1d)
Headlamp masks/converters fitted
Front Front wheel bearings are slightly rough (2.3.5b)
How Reliable is the Cagiva MITO-125?
Based on 4,171 MOT tests across 712 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HX04 XBU is a 2004 Cagiva MITO-125 in Black with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 71.4%.
Across all 2004 Cagiva MITO-125 models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.2% with a typical mileage of 16,338 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Cagiva MITO-125 fails its MOT is stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies, accounting for 220 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HX04 XBU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Cagiva MITO-125 typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 22 years old, this Cagiva MITO-125 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HX04 XBU?
You can check the full history of HX04 XBU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HX04 XBU registered?
HX04 XBU is a 2004 Cagiva MITO-125, first registered on 1 August 2004.
Is HX04 XBU safe to buy?
The MOT history for HX04 XBU shows 14 tests with a 71.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HX04 XBU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HX04 XBU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.