MOT Status
ValidMileage
51,039 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit worn uneven (5.2.3 (e))
Headlamp lens slightly defective slightly dis coloured. (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear light slight deteriorated. (4.7.1 (a))
Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear engine mount bushes worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
front brake reservoir sight glass deteriorated.
Headlamp light intensity reduced lens faded. (4.1.4 (a))
Rear Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement movement in engine mount bushes. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
front brake reservoir sight glass deteriorated.
rear brake reservoir sight glass deteriorated.
Rear Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
rear brake reservoir sight glass deteriorated.
Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened rear shock absorbers. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
front brake reservoir sight glass deteriorated,
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened rear shock absorbers. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
front brake reservoir sight glass deteriorated,
Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened rear shock absorbers corroded. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Nearside All direction indicators not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Offside All direction indicators not working intermittent when steering turned. (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened rear shock absorbers corroded. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
lower exhaust bolt missing
rear brake lever harsh in operation.
front side light not working.
Front Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Headlamp aim not tested (4.1.2 (b))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Suspension component pin or bush excessively worn rear engine mount bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement engine mount bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake fluid reservoir fluid level significantly below minimum level (1.1.10 (d) (ii))
Rear Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement engine mount bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
How Reliable is the Peugeot Tweet?
Based on 11,093 MOT tests across 2,456 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HX12 JYP is a 2012 Peugeot Tweet in White with a 125cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2012 Peugeot Tweet models, the average MOT pass rate is 83.6% with a typical mileage of 11,467 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot Tweet fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 70 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HX12 JYP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot Tweet typically stays on UK roads for around 16 years. At 14 years old, this Peugeot Tweet is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HX12 JYP?
You can check the full history of HX12 JYP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HX12 JYP registered?
HX12 JYP is a 2012 Peugeot Tweet, first registered on 1 April 2012.
Is HX12 JYP safe to buy?
The MOT history for HX12 JYP shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HX12 JYP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HX12 JYP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.