MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
24,859 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Headlamp damaged but function not impaired (1.2.3a)
Rear Drive chain lightly rubbing (6.2.1d)
Front Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Nearside Front Steering lock stop ineffective (2.1.3)
Gear change lever worn and loose
Rear Drive chain lightly rubbing (6.2.1d)
Rear Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Exhaust end cap loose
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Gear lever bent
Headlamp lens cracked
N/S Foot rest broken
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
Speedo/ clocks loose
Steering control has reduced clearance at full lock not affecting the riders grasp of handlebars (2.1.2b)
Swinging arm damaged/ chaffed
Drive chain worn to excess (6.2.1e) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
Rear Drive chain sprocket worn to excess (6.2.1e) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Exhaust end cap loose
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Gear lever bent
Headlamp lens cracked
N/S Foot rest broken
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Speedo/ clocks loose
Steering control has reduced clearance at full lock not affecting the riders grasp of handlebars (2.1.2b)
Swinging arm damaged/ chaffed
Both mirrors loose.
Chain rusty.
Clutch cable outer case broken at lever.
Drive chain at max adjustment.
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Headlamp deteriorated but function not impaired (1.2.3a)
N/S fairing bolts missing and mounting broken.
N/S foot peg broken.
Number plate dirty/overspray
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Rear suspension lightly rubbing not affecting the movement of the rear suspension (2.4.A.3a)
Top radiator bolt missing.
o/s/r foot peg seized.
Exhaust mounting does not fully support the exhaust system (7.1.1.c)
Nearside Front Direction indicator not working (1.5.1c) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Direction indicator insecure (1.5.3b) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Direction indicator not working (1.5.1c) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
Riders seat insecure (6.2.1a) DANGEROUS
Both mirrors loose.
Chain rusty.
Clutch cable outer case broken at lever.
Drive chain at max adjustment.
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Headlamp deteriorated but function not impaired (1.2.3a)
N/S fairing bolts missing and mounting broken.
N/S foot peg broken.
N/S/F indicator missing lens.
Number plate dirty/overspray
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Rear suspension lightly rubbing not affecting the movement of the rear suspension (2.4.A.3a)
Top radiator bolt missing.
o/s/r foot peg seized.
Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Lower Rear mono-shock pivot worn but not excessive (2.4.B.4)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
gear lever pivot bolt loose
Exhaust mounting does not fully support the exhaust system (7.1.1.c)
Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (1.6)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Indicator switch insecure (1.5.4)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Handlebar handgrip not secure to handlebars. (2.1.1c) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Direction indicator insecure (1.5.3b) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a) DANGEROUS
Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Lower Rear mono-shock pivot worn but not excessive (2.4.B.4)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
gear lever pivot bolt loose
low on 2 stroke oil
number plate light lens missing a screw and lens loose
o/s bar end missing
Front Front wheel bearings are excessively rough (2.3.5b)
Rear Front wheel bearings have excessive free play (2.3.5b)
front tyre just legal clock mountings worn rear brake assembly worn poor condition
How Reliable is the Cagiva MITO-125?
Based on 4,171 MOT tests across 712 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HX53 KZF is a 2004 Cagiva MITO-125 in Yellow with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 13 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 53.8%.
Across all 2004 Cagiva MITO-125 models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.2% with a typical mileage of 16,338 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Cagiva MITO-125 fails its MOT is stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies, accounting for 220 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HX53 KZF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Cagiva MITO-125 typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 22 years old, this Cagiva MITO-125 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HX53 KZF?
You can check the full history of HX53 KZF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HX53 KZF registered?
HX53 KZF is a 2004 Cagiva MITO-125, first registered on 1 January 2004.
Is HX53 KZF safe to buy?
The MOT history for HX53 KZF shows 13 tests with a 53.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HX53 KZF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HX53 KZF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.