MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
163,830 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
general corrosion under van
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced b post (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Service brake requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair (1.2.1 (c))
Tail pipe corroded
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced b post (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Tail pipe corroded
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Brake master cylinder/servo mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded arch (1.1.21 (e) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced b post (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Tail pipe corroded
Nearside Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside front 'b' post to sill corroded and holed not within prescribed areas
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
handbrake effort just met requirements on brake roller test
Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn both upper front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn both front upper arms, front bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside front 'b' post to sill corroded and holed not within prescribed areas
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
handbrake effort just met requirements on brake roller test
nsr tyre wearing on inside edge
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
nsr tyre wearing on inside edge
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Upper Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
How Reliable is the Iveco Daily?
Based on 817,098 MOT tests across 76,231 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HX59 CWG is a 2010 Iveco Daily in White with a 2,287cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.6%.
Across all 2010 Iveco Daily models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.7% with a typical mileage of 115,068 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Iveco Daily fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 54,319 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HX59 CWG, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Iveco Daily typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 16 years old, this Iveco Daily is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HX59 CWG?
You can check the full history of HX59 CWG by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HX59 CWG registered?
HX59 CWG is a 2010 Iveco Daily, first registered on 22 February 2010.
Is HX59 CWG safe to buy?
The MOT history for HX59 CWG shows 17 tests with a 70.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HX59 CWG have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HX59 CWG. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.