MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
31,329 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Emissions not tested not tested due to oil leak and engine making noise (8.2.2.2 (e))
Nearside Battery insecure and likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Oil leaking excessively from engine engine oil leak (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe at imminent risk of failure or fracture (1.1.11 (a)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Wheel bearing play so excessive it is likely to break up (5.1.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Service brake has no recorded effort at a wheel both rear brake very low effort (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Corrosion under vehicle
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing catching on exhaust bracket (5.3.2 (b))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush Both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Reverse light inop
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded As marked (1.1.11 (c))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Corrosion under vehicle
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing catching on exhaust bracket (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush Both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Reverse light inop
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases back box (7.1.2)
Nearside Front tyre wearing outer edge
Offside wiper splitting
Oil leak ()
Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated shackle pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement both (2.4.B.2)
corrosion under vehicle
exhaust corroding
possible rear diff bearing noise
Front Direction indicator incorrect colour both (1.4.A.2f)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Stop lamp not working both (1.2.1b)
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases back box (7.1.2)
Nearside Front tyre wearing outer edge
Offside wiper splitting
Oil leak ()
Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated shackle pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement both (2.4.B.2)
corrosion under vehicle
exhaust corroding
possible rear diff bearing noise
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured both (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Front tyre wearing inner edge
corrosion under vehicle
exhaust corroding
poss noise from rear diff bearings
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (3.7.B.5b)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Stop lamp not working both (1.2.1b)
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured both (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Front tyre wearing inner edge
corrosion under vehicle
exhaust corroding
poss noise from rear diff bearings
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated shackle pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.B.2)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
corrosion under vehicle
exhaust corroding
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Stop lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.2.1f)
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated shackle pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.B.2)
Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
corrosion under vehicle
exhaust corroding
o/s/r brake slightly binding
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.6.D2)
Fuel system component leaking (7.2.3)
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside Leaf spring anchor bracket damaged and seriously weakened (2.4.B.6d)
Nearside Vehicle structure has an inadequate repair, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Offside Front Direction indicator incomplete (1.5.A1b)
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.6.D2)
Offside Rear Shock absorber casing damaged externally so the unit does not function (2.7.2a)
Offside Stop lamp excessively damaged so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.2.1d)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Rear registration plate dirty (6.3.1d)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Piaggio Porter?
Based on 18,238 MOT tests across 1,312 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HY51 EYM is a 2002 Piaggio Porter in White with a 1,371cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.7%.
Across all 2002 Piaggio Porter models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.5% with a typical mileage of 34,201 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Piaggio Porter fails its MOT is service brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 991 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HY51 EYM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Piaggio Porter typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 24 years old, this Piaggio Porter is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HY51 EYM?
You can check the full history of HY51 EYM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HY51 EYM registered?
HY51 EYM is a 2002 Piaggio Porter, first registered on 1 February 2002.
Is HY51 EYM safe to buy?
The MOT history for HY51 EYM shows 17 tests with a 64.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HY51 EYM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HY51 EYM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.