MOT Status
ValidMileage
47,796 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced REAR SWINGARM RUSTY BUT SOLID (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded RUSTY SPOKES (5.2.2 (d))
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Rear REAR TYRE HAS SMALL CRACKS IN
Rear Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Wheel spoke slightly corroded RUSTY SPOKES (5.2.2 (d))
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Rear Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement swingarm play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Rear Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement swingarm play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Rear Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake indicates a slightly grabbing brake (1.2.1 (c))
Rear Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear rear tyre wall slightly perished
Rear Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Central Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Stop lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (4.3.3 (b))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Stop lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (4.3.3 (b))
Rear Wheel spindle locking device missing (5.2.1 (d))
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the steering (2.4 (a))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded. (4.2.1b)
Front front tyre slightly perished
Rear Wheel spoke slightly corroded. (4.2.1b)
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
Front front tyre cracked but no cord showing
Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Nearside Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.3.3)
Nearside Rear Rear shock absorber insecurely mounted (2.4.A.3b)
Front front tyre cracked but no cord showing
Drive chain slightly tight (6.2.1d)
Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
front tyre getting close to minumum tread depth
Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
Drive chain slightly tight (6.2.1d)
Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
front tyre getting close to minumum tread depth
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Front Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d)
Nearside Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.3.3)
Rear Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Lower Motorcycle structure excessively corroded (6.1.1a) DANGEROUS
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Front Brake fluid reservoir fluid level low (3.2.B1d)
Front Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
Rear Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
Rear suspension bush has excessive free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Throttle has a significant change in engine speed whilst moving the steering from lock to lock (2.1.4)
Front Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
Rear Rear suspension bearing has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Rear Tyre is one with no centre line from New and has about 2mm of tread laef on it
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
How Reliable is the Suzuki GN250?
Based on 8,545 MOT tests across 956 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
J217 PTA is a 1992 Suzuki GN250 in Red with a 249cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 69.6%.
Across all 1992 Suzuki GN250 models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.1% with a typical mileage of 24,336 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Suzuki GN250 fails its MOT is stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies, accounting for 145 recorded failures. If you're considering buying J217 PTA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki GN250 typically stays on UK roads for around 39 years. At 34 years old, this Suzuki GN250 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of J217 PTA?
You can check the full history of J217 PTA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was J217 PTA registered?
J217 PTA is a 1992 Suzuki GN250, first registered on 15 May 1992.
Is J217 PTA safe to buy?
The MOT history for J217 PTA shows 23 tests with a 69.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does J217 PTA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on J217 PTA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.