MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
98,053 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Centre Front Brake servo corroded but not excessively weakened (3.6.A.2b)
Centre Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded at point of brake compensator valve (3.6.B.2c)
Front Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both bushes (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Torque/reaction arm has a slightly deteriorated rubber bush front and rear bushes on arm (2.4.G.2)
Rear Anti-roll bar linkage worn but not seriously weakened both sides (2.4.G.1)
Rear Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides bushes (2.4.G.2)
Rear all brake pipe unions are corroded but show no signs of leaks
all rear suspension components are corroded
cant see front brake pads
cant test rear seatbelts because rear seats are folded
rear chassis inner both sides has slight corrosion
Anti-roll bar linkage rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Nearside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
general corrosion to front and rear braking componants not excessive at present
general corrosion to front and rear suspension componants not excessive at present
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
o/s/f tyre wearing close to legal tread depth on inner edge
surface corrosion to front and rear braking componants not excessive at present
surface corrosion to front and rear suspension componants not excessive at present
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
surface corrosion to suspension componants not excessive
tested in wet conditions
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
both front anti roll bar ink rubbers deteriated
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (2.7.5)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Headlamp aim too far to the right (1.8)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
both front anti roll bar ink rubbers deteriated
Nearside Front Mechanical brake component has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
How Reliable is the Mazda 323?
Based on 823,541 MOT tests across 88,407 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
J667 DYL is a 1992 Mazda 323 in Red with a 1,598cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 13 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 84.6%.
Across all 1992 Mazda 323 models, the average MOT pass rate is 62.0% with a typical mileage of 98,243 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mazda 323 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 53,662 recorded failures. If you're considering buying J667 DYL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda 323 typically stays on UK roads for around 38 years. At 34 years old, this Mazda 323 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of J667 DYL?
You can check the full history of J667 DYL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was J667 DYL registered?
J667 DYL is a 1992 Mazda 323, first registered on 16 June 1992.
Is J667 DYL safe to buy?
The MOT history for J667 DYL shows 13 tests with a 84.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does J667 DYL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on J667 DYL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.