MOT Status
ValidMileage
135,669 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
front and rear suspension corroded
rear exhaust silencer corroded
Coil spring corroded all (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
rear exhaust silencer corroded
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
all coil springs corroded
rear suspension arms corroded
slight corrosion on front sub-frame (o/s)
slight exhaust blow on cat
front exhaust mounting corroded
n/s/f coil spring corroded
n/s/f tyre tread worn on outer edges
oil leak
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
n/s/f tyre tread worn on outer edges
n/s/r brake grabbing
o/s/r shock-absorber weeping
rear number plate worn
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
fuel cap seal perrished
exhaust rubbers perrished
front brake pads low
n/s/f brake grabbing
o/s/r tyre tread low
all coil springs corroded
hand brake travel
n/s hand brake effort low
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
all rear suspension bushes perrished
both rear and o/s/f tyre treads wearing low
oil leak on engine
power steering pump damp
small chips in screen
both sides rear suspension arms rusting
Offside Side repeater not working (1.4.A.2c)
both sides rear suspension arms rusting
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
front exhaust bracket deteriorating
oil leak on engine
both sides front brake discs back plates rusty
both sides froont lower suspension arms very rusty
n/s/r light unit cracked
powre steering pipes rusty
signs of corrosion to n/s/f inner wing under battery
some markings on n/s/f seat beat webbing
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Centre Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
Offside Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Rear brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.5c)
Advise attention to front exhaust steady bracket.
Number plate lamps slightly loose.
Centre Exhaust mounting missing (7.1.1b)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Rear Upper Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Rear Upper Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Advise attention to front exhaust steady bracket.
Number plate lamps slightly loose.
Slight exhaust leaks.
How Reliable is the Volvo 240?
Based on 134,955 MOT tests across 18,976 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
J717 ECH is a 1992 Volvo 240 in Blue with a 2,316cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 25 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 80%.
Across all 1992 Volvo 240 models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.6% with a typical mileage of 142,984 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Volvo 240 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 6,198 recorded failures. If you're considering buying J717 ECH, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo 240 typically stays on UK roads for around 47 years. At 34 years old, this Volvo 240 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of J717 ECH?
You can check the full history of J717 ECH by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was J717 ECH registered?
J717 ECH is a 1992 Volvo 240, first registered on 30 March 1992.
Is J717 ECH safe to buy?
The MOT history for J717 ECH shows 25 tests with a 80% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does J717 ECH have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on J717 ECH. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.