MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
21,684 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Front suspension ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Obligatory mirror damaged, but not seriously affecting the rear view (8.1.2a)
both rear light lens cracked and broken but no white light showing
o/s/f floor and chassis corroded but not too excess
Fuel cap/sealing device does not fasten securely by positive means (7.2.4b)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring fractured 2 leaf,s (2.4.B.1a)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded front of rear spring (2.4.A.3)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside Rear Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
Offside Rear Leaf spring fractured 1 leaf (2.4.B.1a)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
engine cover and undertrays fitted
under vehicle becoming corroded would advise treatment
various brake pipes surface corrosion
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Fuel pipe/s corroded
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
under vehicle corroded not in pescribed areas nbut would advise treatment
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
some parts of the underside floor is showing signs of corrosion
Nearside Front Body has a sharp edge caused by damage (6.1.C.1)
Nearside Front Obligatory mirror insecure (8.1.1)
Offside Front Obligatory mirror insecure (8.1.1)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Leaf spring fractured (2.4.B.1a)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
some parts of the underside floor is showing signs of corrosion
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
under vehicle has surface corossion not to excess at time of test but will need treatment
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
front brake discs wearing thin
under vehicle has surface corossion
Windscreen has damage to an area in excess of a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
front brake discs wearing thin
under vehicle has surface corossion
Oil leak
front to rear brake pipes slightly corroded
rear load area has been welded from the inside
Nearside Rear Leaf spring cracked (2.4.B.1a)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Oil leak
frotn to rear brake pipe slightly corroded
both front tyres perrished
rear brake pipes corroded
underside body is corroded
underside of vehicle has been patched and undersealed
underside of vehicle is corroded not to excess at time of test
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Nearside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Rear Exhaust has a part missing (7.1.1a)
both front tyres perrished
rear brake pipes corroded
underside body is corroded
underside of vehicle is corroded not to excess at time of test
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Nearside Stop lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.2.1f)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
front number plate cracked
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
front number plate cracked
Fuel pipe/s corroded
Nearside Rear Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Suspension joint nearside lower dust cover split/missing
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
front number plate cracked
front number plate cracked
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside Headlamp not in good working order adversely affecting beam image (1.2.4a)
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
front number plate cracked
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
front number plate crack
How Reliable is the Ford P100?
Based on 33,632 MOT tests across 5,150 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
J792 LRT is a 1992 Ford P100 in Red with a 1,993cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.2%.
Across all 1992 Ford P100 models, the average MOT pass rate is 65.5% with a typical mileage of 52,137 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford P100 fails its MOT is seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 3,821 recorded failures. If you're considering buying J792 LRT, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford P100 typically stays on UK roads for around 38 years. At 34 years old, this Ford P100 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of J792 LRT?
You can check the full history of J792 LRT by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was J792 LRT registered?
J792 LRT is a 1992 Ford P100, first registered on 4 March 1992.
Is J792 LRT safe to buy?
The MOT history for J792 LRT shows 19 tests with a 63.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does J792 LRT have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on J792 LRT. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.