MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
90,396 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
both front brake discs becoming pitted
exhaust system becoming corroded
general underside corrosion to floor and all suspension components
oil leak
Nearside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Offside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
rear brakes release unevenly (3.7.B.4)
both front brake discs becoming pitted
exhaust system becoming corroded
general underside corrosion to floor and all suspension components
oil leak
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Oil leak
Nearside Front Macpherson strut corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Macpherson strut corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front position lamp(s) adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.A.3f)
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Steering rack gaiter deteriorated (2.2.D.2d)
An item not tested (Manual)
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Nearside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Steering locking device insecure (2.2.C.1g) DANGEROUS
Offside Steering locking device missing (2.2.C.1g) DANGEROUS
Offside front brake juddering severely (3.7.A.2b) DANGEROUS
front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2) DANGEROUS
front brakes release unevenly (3.7.B.4) DANGEROUS
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2) DANGEROUS
rear brakes release unevenly (3.7.B.4) DANGEROUS
battery terminals are corroded
both front seats are loose
both front top suspension mounts are cracking
door shuts are covered
engine oil level is low and there are leaks in the engine bay
exhaust system corroded
front number plate is loose
hubcaps on roadwheels
nearside door mirror needs adjusting
offside front shock absorber is weeping
offside rear tyre is cracking on the outer wall
rear brake are noisy in application
spare tyre is deflated
stonechips in windowscreen
upper bodywork damaged
wiper blades need cleaning
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
Nearside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper not operating over a large enough area to give an adequate view (8.2.1c)
Offside Headlamp insecure (1.7.3) DANGEROUS
Both front top suspension mounts cracking
Door shuts partially covered
Exhaust system corroded
Hubcaps on wheels
Offside front shock absorber weeping
Offside wiper blade split
Rear number plate contaminated
Slight binding on both front wheels
Slight play in both seat bases
Stonechips on screen
Various suspension bushes cracking
How Reliable is the Peugeot 304?
Based on 1,700 MOT tests across 228 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
JKU 867P is a 1975 Peugeot 304 in Green with a 1,288cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 10 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 1975 Peugeot 304 models, the average MOT pass rate is 64.5% with a typical mileage of 56,198 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot 304 fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 111 recorded failures. If you're considering buying JKU 867P, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 304 typically stays on UK roads for around 55 years. At 51 years old, this Peugeot 304 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of JKU 867P?
You can check the full history of JKU 867P by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was JKU 867P registered?
JKU 867P is a 1975 Peugeot 304, first registered on 1 August 1975.
Is JKU 867P safe to buy?
The MOT history for JKU 867P shows 10 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does JKU 867P have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on JKU 867P. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.